Research Article

Evaluation of Unidentified Signatures According to Sending Location and Document Type

  • Bahadır Kumral
  • H. Mehmet Akın
  • H. Bülent Üner
  • G. Nurhan İnce

Received Date: 14.04.2014 Accepted Date: 22.04.2014 Namik Kemal Med J 2014;2(1):38-41

Aim:

The meaning of the signature is explained as “The mark which is always used identically by a person to indicate that he/she writes or approves any document” in the official dictionary of the Turkish Language Association (TDK). In forensic science documents investigations, it is met with difficulties in regard to preparing a report related to the investigations about the identification of signatures appended by creating a straight line or irrelevant figures that are not generally described as signature. With this study, it was aimed to scrutinize the signatures for which an opinion was not expressed about the identification of appended signatures in the considerations given by the Courts and Public Prosecution Offices regarding the identification of signature or signatures in the questioned documents in 2011 and sent to Physics Specialization Department of the Council of Forensic Medicine.

Materials and Methods:

The study was performed with retrospective examination of the reports (the region sending the document, type of the court, type of the document, characteristic of the document) (n=889) delivered as the signature or signatures in the questioned documents were unidentified in the files (n=11.872) sent to Physics Specialization Department of the Council of Forensic Medicine by the Courts and Public Prosecution Offices in 2011.

Results:

The opinion was expressed on original copies of 867 documents (97,5%), photocopies and carbon copies of 22 documents. Documents were as followings regarding the type of the document: 352 muniments (39,6%), 182 cheques (20,5%), 170 papers prepared as document title (19,1%), 98 contracts (11,0%), 31 statements of employment and dismissal notices (3,7%), 25 papers prepared as record (2,8%), 13 acquittances, 16 other documents (rental contract, letter of attorney, pay roll etc.). 7.5% of documents was unidentified.

Conclusion:

To contribute to solution of judicial uncertainty created by unidentified signatures despite every type of investigation and to prevention of financial and emotional losses, it is essential to develop habits of appending accurate and reliable signatures.

Keywords: Forensic science, signature, determination