Original Article

The Relationship Between Chest Computed Tomography Severity Scores and Demographic Features, Laboratory Parameters and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19

10.4274/nkmj.galenos.2022.37232

  • Burcu AKMAN
  • Hatice Ayça ATA KORKMAZ

Received Date: 26.04.2022 Accepted Date: 26.07.2022 Namik Kemal Med J 2022;10(4):335-343

Aim:

We aimed to investigate the relationship between chest computed tomography-severity score (CT-SS) and demographic and laboratory findings and mortality in Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Materials and Methods:

Our study was a single-center retrospective analysis of 162 patients (aged ≥18 years) with COVID-19. We included laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients between October 2020 and April 2021. Chest CT imagings, laboratory findings, and demographic data were collected at admission. CT-SS was calculated using a visual semi-quantitative scoring system (total score 0-25). We divided the patients into three subgroups based on chest CT-SS, as mild (0-7), moderate (8-17) and severe (>18).

Results:

The mild group consisted of 91 patients (56.2%) with a median CT-SS value of 2 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-5], the moderate group consisted of 65 patients (40.1%) with a median CT-SS value of 11 (IQR 9-12), and the severe group was composed of 6 patients (3.7%) with a median CT-SS value of 19.5 (IQR 18-24). We found statistically significant relationships between high CT-SS and lymphocytopenia (p=0.001), increased C-reactive protein (p<0.001), procalcitonin (p<0.001), lactate dehydrogenase (p<0.001), serum creatinine (p<0.001), D-dimer (p<0.001), prolonged prothrombin time levels (p=0.006), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.014), chronic renal disease (p=0.001), and cerebrovascular disease (p=0.029) in chi-square test. In addition, high CT-SS was statistically correlated with high mortality risk (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

There was a relationship between high CT-SS and high mortality, inflammatory and anticoagulant laboratory markers, and some comorbidities in COVID-19 patients. Evaluation of CT-SSs and risk factors of demographic characteristics and laboratory findings provide useful prognostic information about the survival of COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: COVID-19, computed tomography, pneumonia, mortality

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by Severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2, which was firstly reported in Wuhan, China1. Most COVID-19 patients have a good prognosis and mild symptoms. However, in some patients, severe pneumonia, pulmonary edema, Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure, and death were observed2.

A specific viral nucleic acid test, real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, was rapidly produced3. The RT-PCR test is standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19 but may give a false-negative result in some cases. False-negative RT-PCR results may depend on the early stages of the disease, possibly due to insufficient viral specimens in the sample or technical problems during nucleic acid extraction4,5. Based on past clinical information, chest  computed tomography (CT) imaging can show abnormalities before RT-PCR testing. Currently, high-resolution CT has become one of the main screening methods for diagnosing and evaluating disease severity6. The typical chest CT findings in COVID-19 pneumonia are bilateral, peripheral, and basal predominant ground-glass opacities (GGOs) with or without consolidation and bronchovascular thickening7.

In our study, the severity of lung involvement was visually scored according to the method proposed by Pan et al.8. We purposed to investigate the correlation between chest CT-severity score (SS) and age, gender, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and mortality in patients with COVID-19. As a result of our study, we aimed to detect high-risk COVID-19 patients who would require intensive treatment and might provide a risk stratification model for such patients.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Kanuni Training and Research Hospital and by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey and it was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (date: 12.11.2020, no: 2020/68), and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Study Population and Data Collection

Our study was a single-center retrospective analysis conducted on an original cohort of 162 patients with COVID-19, who underwent chest CT scans in the Radiology Department of Kanuni Training and Research Hospital between October 2020 and April 2021. We included only laboratory-confirmed patients determined by positive RT-PCR in samples acquired from oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal sites in accordance with the World Health Organization interim guidelines. RT-PCR tests were repeated in patients with a high clinic and radiologic suspicion of COVID-19 when the initial PCR test was negative. We excluded the patients under 18 years of age or who had no chest CT scan.

We collected the data for retrospective analysis including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and chest CT imaging obtained at the time of admission. Chest CTs were performed on patients with fever, dry cough, respiratory distress, abnormal laboratory findings, and positive PCR test results. Chest CT scans of all patients were performed within 24 hours at the latest after admission to the hospital.

All patients underwent blood tests including complete blood count, kidney and liver function tests, troponin, D-dimer, prothrombin time (PT), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT), international normalized ratio (INR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin. We analyzed the laboratory results at the time of admission to the hospital.

CT Protocol

All patients underwent chest CT examinations on two multidetector CT scanners (16-slice Somatom Sensation; Siemens Healthineers or 128-slice GE Healthcare Computed Tomography Revolution EVO System). The non-contrast scans were performed with the following parameters: tube voltage=120 kV; tube current=70-280 automatic milliamperes; helical pitch=1.375; slice thickness=5 mm and interval=5 mm (128- slice GE Healthcare Computed Tomography Revolution EVO System) or tube voltage=130 kV; tube current=70-114 automatic milliamperes; helical pitch=1; slice thickness=5 mm and interval=5 mm (16- slice Somatom Sensation; Siemens Healthineers). Images were reconstructed with a 1.25 mm slice thickness. All chest CT scans were assessed at a lung window of 1200 WW and -600 WL and a mediastinal window of 400 WW and 40 WL.

Image Analysis

A radiologist with more than 14 years of experience in chest CT imaging performed the CT image analysis in a standard clinical picture archiving and diagnostic system (PACS) workstation, blinded to the clinical data and laboratory indicators. The involvement of each pulmonary lobe was recorded and the 25 Point CT severity scores were calculated by using a semi-quantitative CT severity scoring system visually8-10. This scoring system depends on visual evaluation of pulmonary involvement based on the area in each of 5 lobes. Each lobe was scored from 0 to 5 as: 0, no involvement; 1, <5% involvement; 2, 25% involvement; 3, 26-49% involvement; 4, 50-75% involvement; 5, >75% involvement. Then, the total CT score was calculated by the sum of the CT scores of 5 lobes ranging from 0 (none) to 25 (maximum). Considering pulmonary involvement, we divided the COVID-19 patients into three subgroups based on the chest CT score, as mild (total severity score of less than 7), moderate (total severity score of 8-17) (Figure 1), or severe (18 and more), which was used by Saeed et al.9.

Statistical Analysis

The study sample size was determined as 122 using the G-power program by taking impact size 0.30, α=0.05, power (1-β)=0.85 at a confidence level. A total of 162 were reached. Statistical analyses were performed by using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. Armonk, NY). Categorical variables were defined as frequency and percentage; continuous variables were defined as the mean±standard deviation or median [interquartile range (IQR)]. The conformity of the variables to the normal distribution was examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were employed to compare the non-normally distributed variables according to the CT-SS groups. The chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between CT-SS groups and laboratory and demographic characteristics. The Fisher’s test was used when the values displayed in the cells did not meet the assumptions of the chi-square test. The statistical significance level was accepted as 0.05 in the study.


RESULTS

Demographic Features

A total of 162 patients, including 69 male (42.6%) and 93 female (57.4%), were enrolled in the study. The mean age of total patients was 54.3±17.29 (ranging from 18 to 97) years. The most affected age group was the 61-70-year age group (37 patients; 22.8%) followed by the 51–60-year age group (35 patients; 21.6%), then the 41-50-year age group (28 patients; 17.3%) and the >70-year age group (26 patients; 16%).

The most common comorbidities were hypertension (HT) (77/162; 47.5%), diabetes mellitus (DM) (45/162; 27.8%), atherosclerotic heart disease (26/162; 16%), and congestive heart failure (16/162; 9.9%). Of the total 162 cases, 151 (93.2%) were discharged, and 11 (6.8%) died due to COVID-19 at hospital (Table 1).

Laboratory Parameters

In our study, most of the patients (109, 67.3%) had high CRP values. Laboratory results showed elevated D-dimer in 42 (25.9%) patients, LDH levels in 62 (38.3%) patients, prolonged PT in 20 (12.3%) patients, PTT in 7 (4.3%) patients, increased INR in 14 (8.6%) patients, high troponin levels in 8 (4.9%) patients, lymphocytopenia in 15 (9.3%) patients, and anemia in 33 (20.4) patients (Table 1).

Chest CT Severity Scores

One hundred-twenty six (77.8%) COVID-19 confirmed cases had pneumonia and 36 (22.2%) COVID-19 confirmed cases had no pneumonia in their chest CT imaging at the time of admission. CT severity scores ranged from 0 to 24, with a mean value of 6.66±5.50 and a median value of 6 (IQR 1-11). The mild group (CT-SS of 0-7) consisted of 91 patients (56.2%), the moderate group (CT-SS of 8-17) consisted of 65 patients (40.1%) whereas the severe group (CT-SS of 18-25) was composed of 6 patients (3.7%). The median CT-SS value was 2 (IQR 0-5) for the mild group, 11 (IQR 9-12) for the moderate group, and 19.5 (IQR 18-24) for the severe group (Table 2).

Pathological involvement was most common in the inferior lobes, in the right lower lobe in 113 patients (69.8%) and in the left lower lobe in 114 patients (70.4%). The right upper lobe was involved in 97 patients (59.9%), the right middle lobe was involved in 99 patients (61.1%), left upper lobe was involved in 110 patients (67.9%). The frequency of each lobe involvement of the CT-SS groups is shown in Table 3.

Correlation between CT Severity Score and Age, Gender, Laboratory Findings, Comorbidities, and Mortality

Age and Gender

There were 91/162 patients with 56 females in the mild group, 65/162 patients with 35 females in the moderate group, and 6/162 patients with 2 females in the severe group. The mean age was 53.15±16.37 years in the mild group, 55.28±18.52 years in the moderate group, and 61.17±17.88 years in the severe group. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of age (p=0.463) (Table 4).

Our results showed no significant statistical difference between CT-SS groups and gender (p=0.302). Also, there was no statistical correlation between age and CT-SS in the Spearman’s test [correlation coefficient (r)=0.101; p=0.200].

Laboratory Results

In the current study, we found statistically significant relationships between CT-SS and lymphocytopenia (p=0.001), increased CRP (p<0.001), procalcitonin (p<0.001), LDH (p<0.001), Cr (p<0.001), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p=0.017) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p<0.001), troponin (p=0.028), D-dimer levels (p<0.001) and prolonged PT levels (p=0.006) in the chi-square test (Table 5). A statistically significant difference was found by comparing groups 1-3 with regard to high procalcitonin, D-dimer, Cr, AST levels, prolonged PT levels, and lymphocytopenia. Also, a statistically significant difference was found by comparing groups 1-2 in terms of high LDH, CRP and D-dimer levels in the Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s tests.

Comorbidities

In the mild group; 45/91 (49.5%) patients had a history of HT, 26/91 (28.6%) had DM, 13/91 (14.3%) had atherosclerotic heart disease, and 7/91 (7.7%) had congestive heart failure.

In the moderate group; 27/65 (41.5%) patients had a history of HT, 17/65 (26.2%) had DM, 12/65 (18.5%) had atherosclerotic heart disease, 8/65 (12.5%) had congestive heart failure, 9/65 (12.3%) had Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 8/65 (12.3%) patients had cerebrovascular disease.

In the severe group; 5/6 (83.3%) patients had a history of HT, 2/6 (33.3%) had DM, 1/6 (16.7%) had atherosclerotic heart disease, 2/6 (33.3%) had chronic renal disease, 1/6 (16.7%) had congestive heart failure, and 1/6 (16.7%) patient had malignities.

Statistically significant relationships were found between high CT score and history of COPD (p=0.014), chronic renal disease (p=0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (p=0.029) in the chi-square test (Table 6). A statistically significant difference was found when the groups 1-2 were compared in terms of the history of COPD (p=0.008) and cerebrovascular disease (p=0.016) and groups 1-3 in terms of the history of chronic renal disease (p=0.009) in the Fisher’s test.

Mortality

In our study, a total of 151 (93.2%) patients are alive, and 11 (6.8%) patients died due to COVID-19. Among the mild group, 91 (100%) patients are alive, and 0 patient died. In the moderate group, 77 (87.7%) patients are alive, and 8 (12.3%) died. In the severe group, 3 (50%) patients are alive, and 3 (50%) died (Figure 2). In the current study, a statistically significant correlation was found between the high CT-SS and the high risk for mortality (p<0.001) in the chi-square test. A statistically significant difference was found by comparing groups 1-2 and groups 1-3 in terms of mortality in the Fisher’s test (p<0.001).


DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between chest CT-SS and age, gender, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and mortality in COVID-19 patients. We found a statistically significant relationship between high CT-SS and high mortality rate. Due to the high comorbidity rate in the study population and the two pregnant patients who died due to COVID-19, the mortality in our study is above the Turkey average.

Although RT-PCR is thought to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, it was reported that chest CT was diagnostic in cases with false-negative RT-PCR results. Chest CT is not used only for diagnosis, but also for providing important information in monitoring disease progression and evaluating medical treatment efficacy11. Ai et al.12 reported that the sensitivity of chest CT imaging in indicating COVID-19 infection was 97%, the specificity was 25% with RT-PCR results as the reference standard in 1014 patients. Aslan et al.13 reported that the sensitivity and specificity of the initial CT scan were 90.4% and 64.2% respectively in the study of 250 patients, finally diagnosed with COVID-19.

Different chest CT scoring systems have been used in previous studies on COVID-19 patients. Chest CT-SS can be assessed using software that describes the percentage of lung volumes affected or a visual scoring for each lobe14-16. In some studies, the calculated chest CT severity score visually ranged from 0 to 2014-17. We used the 25-point CT severity scoring system that was used in the literature8-10.

Zhou et al.18 reported that the total CT scores in COVID-19 patients who died were significantly higher than in those who recovered. Francone et al.10 reported that CT-SS was significantly higher in critical and severe patients than in mild ones. They reported that CT-SS ≥18 predicted a high patient mortality in COVID-19 patients. So, in the current study, the CT-SS ≥18 was accepted as the cut-off value between moderate and severe groups. We separated the patients into 3 groups as in the recent study9. In our study, the mortality rates were 0% in the mild group, 12.3% in the moderate group, and 50% in the severe group. As a result, there was a statistically significant relationship between high CT-SS and high mortality in patients.

Increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers and infiltrating immune cells in lung lesions have been reported in patients with critical COVID-19. Cytokine storms can play a vital role in the increased disease severity of COVID-19 patients19. Francone et al.10 reported statistically significant correlations between CT score and CRP and D-dimer levels. According to Saeed et al.9, significant correlations were found between CT-SS and the male gender, with high inflammatory markers. They reported that CT-SS was found to be positively correlated with lymphopenia, increased serum CRP, D-dimer, and ferritin levels9. Zhang et al.2 reported that chest CT score was found to be positively correlated with CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count, procalcitonin, and abnormal coagulation function, and a negative association with lymphocyte count. In the current study, statistically significant correlations were found between CT score vs lymphocytopenia, high CRP, D-dimer, procalcitonin, LDH, Cr, ALT, AST, and troponin levels, and prolonged PT levels.

Different studies in the literature reported that older age, decreased lymphocytes, elevated CRP and D-dimer levels and comorbidities (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases) were important high-risk factors that could lead to an increase in mortality in severe COVID-19 patients20-22. The male gender was most common in the severe group in the current study. However, the results showed no significant correlation between CT-SS and age and gender.

Several studies have reported that COVID-19 patients have a worse prognosis and severe clinical outcomes when multiple risk factors are present, particularly DM, HT, lung, and coronary artery disease23,24. Statistically significant correlations were found between CT score and chronic renal disease, COPD and cerebrovascular disease in the current study.

In addition, some special conditions such as pregnancy and malignancy are associated with the disease severity of COVID-1925,26. In our study, a 28-year-old woman in the severe group (CT-SS=24), who was 29-week pregnant and taken to emergency cesarean section, died due to COVID-19 pneumonia, ARDS, and septicemia (Figure 3).

Several recent studies have reported coagulation disorders, and liver and kidney dysfunctions in COVID-19 patients20,27,28. In our study, laboratory results showed also abnormal liver, kidney, and anticoagulation values. There were statistically significant correlations between CT-SS and high Cr, ALT and AST, D-dimer levels, and prolonged PT levels.

Study Limitations

Our study has some limitations. First, it is a retrospective study performed in a single center and a relatively limited cohort of patients was included in the study. Therefore, a multicenter study with a large sample size is needed for further confirmation. Second, patients’ CT-SSs were calculated by an experienced radiologist using a visual semi-quantitative CT severity scoring system. The accuracy of the study could be increased by two or more observers.


CONCLUSION

There was a relationship between high chest CT-SS and high mortality, inflammatory and anticoagulant laboratory markers, and some comorbidities (chronic renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, COPD) in COVID-19 patients. Chest CT-SS is a useful method for evaluating the severity and extent of COVID-19 pneumonia and it can provide clinicians with more detailed information about patients’ prognosis and can be helpful for early intervention planning.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Mehmet Topal from Amasya University Biostatistics Department, for his contribution to the statistical analyses of the study.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital and by the Minister of Health of the Republic of Turkey and it was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (date: 12.11.2020, no: 2020/68).

Informed Consent: The requirement for informed consent was waived.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: B.A., H.A.A.K., Design: B.A., Data Collection or Processing: B.A., H.A.A.K., Analysis or Interpretation: B.A., Literature Search: B.A., H.A.A.K., Writing: B.A.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.


Images

  1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497-506.
  2. Zhang J, Meng G, Li W, Shi B, Dong H, Su Z, et al. Relationship of chest CT score with clinical characteristics of 108 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Respir Res. 2020;21:180.
  3. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25:2000045.
  4. Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, Zheng C, Wang F, Liu J. Chest CT for Typical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia: Relationship to Negative RT-PCR Testing. Radiology. 2020;296:E41-5.
  5. Kanji JN, Zelyas N, MacDonald C, Pabbaraju K, Khan MN, Prasad A, et al. False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis. Virol J. 2021;18:13.
  6. Ding X, Xu J, Zhou J, Long Q. Chest CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia by duration of symptoms. Eur J Radiol. 2020;127:109009.
  7. Wang Y, Dong C, Hu Y, Li C, Ren Q, Zhang X, et al. Temporal Changes of CT Findings in 90 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Longitudinal Study. Radiology. 2020;296:E55-E64.
  8. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, et al. Time Course of Lung Changes at Chest CT during Recovery from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology. 2020;295:715-21.
  9. Saeed GA, Gaba W, Shah A, Al Helali AA, Raidullah E, Al Ali AB, et al. Correlation between Chest CT Severity Scores and the Clinical Parameters of Adult Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia. Radiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:6697677.
  10. Francone M, Iafrate F, Masci GM, Coco S, Cilia F, Manganaro L, et al. Chest CT score in COVID-19 patients: correlation with disease severity and short-term prognosis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:6808-17.
  11. Abbasi B, Akhavan R, Ghamari Khameneh A, Zandi B, Farrokh D, Pezeshki Rad M, et al. Evaluation of thenrelationshipnbetweenninpatient COVID-19 mortality and chest CT severity score. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;45:458-63.
  12. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, et al. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. 2020;296:E32-40.
  13. Aslan S, Bekçi T, Çakır İM, Ekiz M, Yavuz İ, Şahin AM. Diagnostic performance of low-dose chest CT to detect COVID-19: A Turkish population study. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021;27:181-7.
  14. Li K, Fang Y, Li W, Pan C, Qin P, Zhong Y, et al. CT image visual quantitative evaluation and clinical classification of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Eur Radiol. 2020;30:4407-16.
  15. Huang L, Han R, Ai T, Yu P, Kang H, Tao Q, et al. Serial Quantitative Chest CT Assessment of COVID-19: A Deep Learning Approach. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2:e200075.
  16. Lessmann N, Sánchez CI, Beenen L, Boulogne LH, Brink M, Calli E, et al. Automated Assessment of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and Chest CT Severity Scores in Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19 Using Artificial Intelligence. Radiology. 2021;298:E18-28.
  17. Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, Zhang N, Huang M, Zeng X, et al. CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology. 2020;295:202-7.
  18. Zhou S, Chen C, Hu Y, Lv W, Ai T, Xia L. Chest CT imaging features and severity scores as biomarkers for prognostic prediction in patients with COVID-19. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:1449.
  19. Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, Liu Z, et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393.
  20. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2020;395:1054-62.
  21. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:846-8.
  22. Liu W, Tao ZW, Wang L, Yuan ML, Liu K, Zhou L, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. ChinMed J (Engl). 2020;133:1032-8.
  23. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:2000547.
  24. Bhandari S, Rankawat G, Bagarhatta M, Singh A, Singh A, Gupta V, et al. Clinico-Radiological Evaluation and Correlation of CT Chest Images with Progress of Disease in COVID-19 Patients. J Assoc Physicians India. 2020;68:34-42.
  25. Jindal V, Sahu KK, Gaikazian S, Siddiqui AD, Jaiyesimi I. Cancer treatment during COVID-19 pandemic. Med Oncol. 2020;37:58.
  26. Chen Y, Bai J. Maternal and infant outcomes of full-term pregnancy combined with COVID-2019 in Wuhan, China: retrospective case series. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302:545-51.
  27. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:934-43.
  28. Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, Yan W, Yang D, Chen G, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091.