Can the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte*Platelet Ratio Predict Acute Appendicitis? An Analytical Study
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 12 ISSUE: 1
P: 45 - 51
March 2024

Can the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte*Platelet Ratio Predict Acute Appendicitis? An Analytical Study

Namik Kemal Med J 2024;12(1):45-51
1. University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Emergency Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
2. University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Emergency Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
3. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Karaman, Turkey
4. University of Health Sciences Turkey, Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of General Surgery, İstanbul, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 27.05.2023
Accepted Date: 23.12.2023
Publish Date: 22.03.2024
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aim:

Our primary aim is to determine whether the neutrophil/lymphocyte*platelet ratio (NLPR) has the ability to predict acute appendicitis. Our secondary aim is to show whether the NLPR is effective in differentiating complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis.

Materials and Methods:

Our study was planned retrospectively, and patients over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis and admitted to the Health Sciences University Turkey, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital between 01.04.2022 and 01.04.2023, were included in the study.

Results:

A total of 492 patients were included in our study, and 242 (49.18%) of them were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and NLPR were statistically significantly higher in patients with acute appendicitis compared to the control group (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively) (the area under the curve was 0.96, 0.70, 0.94, respectively).

Conclusion:

NLR, PLR and NLPR can be used as predictors for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but according to our study, NLR, PLR and NLPR should not be used as prognostic indicators of acute appendicitis.

Keywords:
Acute appendicitis, NLR, PLR, NLPR

INTRODUCTION

Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. While the rate of incidence with perforation is 20%, its prevalence is approximately 7%1. Diagnosis is made with clinical and radiological imaging. Laboratory tests are also helpful in diagnosing2. About half of adults have obvious symptoms. Periumbilical abdominal pain, anorexia, vomiting, and fever are the common symptoms3. C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) are often preferred for diagnosis, but there is no specific laboratory test for the diagnosis of appendicitis4. Although it is mostly considered as an inflammatory disease, it is known that immune dysfunctions will increase the susceptibility to infection5.

Neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets that play a role in the coagulation cascade play an important role in immune system dysfunction and systemic inflammation6. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was accepted as an easy-to-calculate, low-cost indicator of systemic inflammation7,8. Neutrophils are the most abundant cell of leukocytes, and they regulate other cell functions such as neutrophils, mast cells and macrophages and are effective in inflammation. Like NLR, platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been used as an early marker of infections in various diseases9. Since appendicitis is an inflammatory disease associated with immune system dysfunction, it was the subject of NLR and PLR studies2,10-13. Another parameter used as an early marker of inflammatory diseases was the neutrophil/lymphocyte*platelet ratio (NLPR). Whether NLPR is a prognostic marker for sepsis14, Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)15 and post-surgery16 were discussed in the literature.

To the best of our knowledge, there is no study evaluating the effect of NLPR on diagnosis and prognosis in adult patients with acute appendicitis.

Our primary aim is to determine whether the NLPR has the ability to predict acute appendicitis. Our secondary aim is to show whether the NLPR is effective in differentiating complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis.

GİRİŞ

Akut apandisit en sık görülen akut abdomen nedenidir. Perforasyon ile birlikte görülme oranı %20 iken; prevalansı yaklaşık %7’dir1. Tanısı klinik ve radyolojik görüntülemeler ile konulur. Laboratuvar testleri de tanı koymada yardımcıdır2. Yetişkinlerin yaklaşık yarısında belirgin semptomlar görülür. Periumblikal karın ağrısı, iştahsızlık, kusma ve ateş sık görülen semptomlarıdır3, C-reaktive protein (CRP) ve beyaz kan hücresi (WBC) tanı koymada sıklıkla tercih edilir ancak apandisit tanısında spesifik bir laboratuvar testi bulunmamaktadır4. Daha çok enflamatuvar bir hastalık olarak değerlendirilse de immün fonksiyon bozukluklarının enfeksiyona yatkınlığı artıracağı bilinmektedir5.

Nötrofiller, lenfositler ve koagülasyon kaskadında rol oynayan plateletler immün sistem fonksiyon bozukluklarında ve sistemik enflamasyonda önemli rol oynarlar6. Nötrofil lenfosit ratio (NLR) sistemik enflamasyonun kolay hesaplanabilen, düşük maliyetli bir göstergesi olarak kabul edildi7,8. Lökositlerin, içeriği en çok olan hücresi nötrofillerdir ve nötrofiller, mast hücreleri, makrofajlar gibi diğer hücre fonksiyonlarını düzenlerler ve enflamasyonda etkilidirler. Platelet lenfosit oranı (PLR) da NLR gibi enfeksiyonların erken belirteci olarak çeşitli hastalıklarda kullanıldı9. Apandisit de immun sistem fonksiyon bozukluğu ile ilişkili olan bir enflamatuvar hastalık olması sebebiyle NLR ve PLR çalışmalarına konu edildi2,10-13. Enflamatuvar hastalıkların erken belirteci olarak kullanılan bir diğer parametre de nötrofil/lenfosit*trombosit oranı (NLPR) idi. NLPR, sepsis14, Koronavirüs hastalığı-2019 (COVID-19)15 ve cerrahi sonrası prognoz belirteci olup olmaması ile ilgili literatürde tartışıldı16.

Tespit edebildiğimiz kadarı ile yetişkin akut apandisit hastalarında NLPR tanı ve prognoza etkisinin değerlendirildiği çalışma bulunmamaktadır.

Birincil amacımız NLPR akut apandisiti öngörebilme yeteneğinin olup olmadığının belirlenmesidir. İkincil amacımız ise NLPR’nin komplike ve non-komplike akut apandisit ayrımında etkin olup olamadığını göstermektir.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics

The instant study was carried out with the permission of the Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital Local Ethics Committee (date: 24/04/2023, decision no: B.10.1.TKH.4.34.H.GP.0.01/131).

Study Design

Our study was retrospectively planned and more than three hundred thousand patients admitted to the emergency department of Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital between 01.04.2022 and 01.04.2023, who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis through computer tomography or ultrasound and examination findings and who were surgically over the age of 18 years were included.

Study Population

Patients whose hemogram parameters were measured and registered in the emergency department were included in the study, but patients with a history of trauma, younger than 18 years of age, and with incomplete data were excluded from the study. The control group was selected from patients without suspected acute appendicitis. Gangrenous appendicitis, intra-abdominal abscess, perforation, plastron formation, and generalized peritonitis were considered in the differentiation of complicated and non-complicated. Patients who could not differentiate between complicated and non-complicated were also excluded from the study.

Data Collection

Demographic characteristics, symptoms and examination findings of the patients were recorded using the hospital data system. Age (year), gender, localized pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, right lower quadrant tenderness, right lower quadrant rebound, high fever, leukocytosis, left shift in WBC and complicated appendicitis status were recorded by the investigators from the patient electronic file. The values of WBC, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit values, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red cell distribution width, platelet count, mean platelet volume, and NLPR obtained from hematology laboratory were recorded. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, glucose, calcium, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, sodium, potassium, and CRP levels were also recorded. The examinations and data of patients who attended the emergency department were used. The patients were classified both as acute appendicitis and control group, and also as complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Hematological values were compared between the patient group with acute appendicitis and the control group. Then, a comparison was made between patients with a diagnosis of complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

NLPR=Neutrophil count (109/L) * 100: Lymphocyte count (109/L) * Platelet count (109/L).

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative variables were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) (IQR, 25th-75th percentile) values, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used in analyzing the paired groups. The categorical data were done using the Fisher’s Exact test and chi-square test. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (SPSS Inc., version 20.0; Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. The Spearman’s correlation analysis test was employed for correlation analysis. Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 492 patients were included in our study, and 242 (49.18%) of our patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Twenty hundred and fifty (50.82%) patients constituted the control group. The most common symptom in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis was right lower quadrant pain (96%). The most common finding was leukocytosis with a rate of 48%. The frequency of symptoms and signs of patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis, and the median (IQR) values of laboratory tests are shown in Table 1.

The mean age of the patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis was 33 years (25-46 years) (p=0.078); Likewise, 58.7% of the patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were male (p<0.001). WBC, neutrophil, and hemoglobin values were higher in patients with acute appendicitis than in the control group (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.001 respectively). Lymphocyte and MCV values were lower in patients with acute appendicitis than in the control group (p<0.001, p=0.001 respectively). NLR, PLR and NLPR values were statistically significantly higher in patients with acute appendicitis (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001 respectively). The comparison of hemogram parameters of the control group and patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis is shown in Table 2.

Of the 242 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis, 70 (28.92%) were those diagnosed with complicated acute appendicitis. 58.6% of patients with complicated acute appendicitis were male (p=1.00). While WBC was high in patients with complicated acute appendicitis, neutrophils and hemoglobin levels were lower than in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, WBC, neutrophil and hemoglobin values were not statistically significant in the diagnosis of complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis (p=0.902, p=0.952, p=0.836 respectively). While lymphocyte is higher in patients with complicated acute appendicitis, MCV was lower. Lymphocyte and MCV values were not statistically significant in the diagnosis of complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis (p=0.427, p=0.337, respectively). NLR, PLR and NLPR values were not statistically significant in the differentiation of complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis (p=0.561, p=0.973, p=0.280, respectively). Hemogram and NLPR values of patients with complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis are shown in Table 3.

Table 4 presents the cut-off, sensitivity, specificity, 95% confidence interval and area under the curve (AUC) values. The cut-off values of NLR, PLR and NLPR were statistically significant in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, and the AUC values were at a good level. According to the diagnostic test performance analysis report, the NLR, PLR, and NLPR were statistically significant predictors of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with AUC values being calculated as 0.96 (0.919-0.95) for NLR at a cut-off value of 3.27, 0.70 (0.63-0.72) for PLR at a cut-off value of 148, and 0.94 (0.83-0.95) for NLPR at a cut-off value of 1.42. AUC of NLPR is presented in Figure 1.

DISCUSSION

In our study, it was determined that NLR, PLR and NLPR were effective in diagnosing acute appendicitis, and NLR, PLR and NLPR were not effective in distinguishing complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis. In the ROC analysis of NLR, PLR and NLPR for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, it was determined that NLR had the highest AUC value. NLPR, on the other hand, was found to be a strong predictor in diagnosing acute appendicitis with a value of 0.94 AUC. In addition, we have concluded that it cannot be an indicator of prognosis. As far as we could detect, there was no study showing the relationship between acute appendicitis and NLPR in terms of diagnosis and prognosis in adult patients over the age of 18 years. However, studies evaluating the relationship of acute appendicitis with hematological parameters were available in the literature10-13.

In a study conducted in pregnant patients diagnosed with appendicitis, the lymphocyte value was statistically significantly lower in patients compared to the control group, similar to our study, and no statistically significant difference was observed in platelet values. NLR and PLR were found to be significantly higher than those in the control group10. In a meta-analysis, it was reported that NLR was effective in both the clinical course and diagnosis of acute appendicitis11. In a study conducted in pediatric acute appendicitis patients, NLR and NLPR were found to be statistically high in patients, and it was stated that these rates could be used in diagnosis12. In the literature, different results were obtained from our study in differentiating complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis2,13. In a study comparing NLR and PLR in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis cases, unlike our study, NLR and PLR were found to be statistically significantly higher in complicated acute appendicitis cases2. In a study by Ribeiro et al.13 in which 841 patients with acute appendicitis were included, leukocyte value and NLR were statistically significantly higher in cases of complicated acute appendicitis than in cases of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. In a study by Uludağ et al.17, including 702 acute appendicitis patients, it was found that perforation developed in 10% of the patients, and NLR and PLR were statistically significantly higher in the perforated patient group compared to the non-perforated acute appendicitis patients.

Apart from acute appendicitis, sepsis14, COVID-1915, kidney damage after major surgery16, pneumonia18, inflammatory diseases such as spondylarthritis19, decompensated heart failure20, contrast nephropathy21, minor surgery and even psychiatric diseases22 were evaluated together with hematological parameters. In a study conducted in 173 patients diagnosed with sepsis, in which mortality was found to be close to 38%, a statistically significant correlation was found between the 5th day neutrophil and platelet values and mortality. In the same study, NLR and NLPR calculated on the 5th day were also found to have a statistically significant relationship with mortality14. In a study in which hematological parameters were examined in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and 500 patients were included, there was no statistically significant relationship between neutrophil and platelet values and disease severity, although lymphocyte was statistically significantly lower in the severe COVID-19 patient group compared to mild COVID-19 patients. NLR and NLPR were statistically significantly higher in severe COVID-19 patients15. In a study examining the development of acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery, no statistically significant correlation was found between postoperative neutrophil and platelet values and the development of acute kidney injury. However, there was a statistically significant correlation between low lymphocyte count and high NLPR and the development of acute kidney injury16. In an examination of pneumonia patients in inpatient and outpatient group and control group, it was determined that CRP, NLR and PLR were statistically significantly higher in inpatients and outpatients compared to the control group. In the same study, there was no statistically significant difference between inpatients and outpatients in terms of CRP, NLR, and PLR18. In a study examining spondylarthritis, it was reported that NLR and PLR could be considered as independent predictors in patients with severe sacroiliitis19. In a study evaluating cardiac deaths in patients with decompensated heart failure, NLR and PLR were found to be statistically significantly higher in cardiac deaths20. In a study examining the relationship between contrast nephropathy and hematological parameters and including patients with acute coronary syndrome, it was found that neutrophil lymphocyte and platelet values were not associated with contrast development. NLR and NLPR were also not associated with the development of contrast nephropathy23. In a prospective study examining patients who underwent septorhinoplasty, with a high postoperative periorbital ecchymosis score, while lymphocytes were statistically significantly lower, neutrophil and platelet values were not statistically significant. No statistically significant correlation was found between NLR and high periorbital ecchymosis score. PLR, on the other hand, was statistically significantly higher22. In a study in which patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared with a healthy control group, neutrophils and lymphocytes were statistically significantly higher in patients with schizophrenia. No statistically significant correlation was found between platelet and NLR and schizophrenic patients. PLR was found to be statistically significantly lower in male patients compared to the control group22. In a study conducted in Turkey that evaluated the ability of hematological parameters to predict short-term mortality in patients with acute cholecystitis, there was a significant difference between survivors and non-survivors in terms of NLR, but not in terms of PLR. Additionally, among the combined hematological parameters evaluated, the parameter with the highest AUC value was NLR, which was 0.70824. In our study, while high levels of NLR, PLR and NLPR, as well as high neutrophil and low lymphocyte levels, were statistically significant in diagnosing acute appendicitis, it was determined that the platelet level was not statistically significant in diagnosing. It was determined that neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were not statistically significant in the differentiation of complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis.

Study Limitations

Since our study was planned retrospectively, the clinical progress of the patients was obtained from the records. Although the included patients were over the age of 18 years, they consisted of young patients and the number of patients diagnosed with complicated acute appendicitis was small.

TARTIŞMA

Çalışmamızda, NLR, PLR ve NLPR akut apandisit tanısında etkili oldu. NLR, PLR ve NLPR komplike ve komplike olmayan akut apandisit ayırımında etkili olmadı. Akut apandisit tanısı için NLR, PLR ve NLPR’nin ROC analizinde, NLR’nin en yüksek AUC değerine sahip olduğu belirlendi. NLPR ise, 0,94 AUC değeri ile akut apandisit tanısında güçlü bir belirleyici olarak bulundu. Buna rağmen, prognostik bir belirteç olamayacağı sonucuna vardık. Belirleyebildiğimiz kadarıyla, 18 yaş üstü yetişkin hastalarda akut apandisit ile NLPR arasındaki ilişkiyi tanı ve prognoz açısından değerlendiren bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Ancak, akut apandisit ile hematolojik parametreler arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendiren çalışmalar literatürde mevcuttur10-13. Akut apandisit tanısı konan hamile hastalarda yapılan bir çalışmada, lenfosit değerinin kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük olduğu, benzer şekilde trombosit değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığı bulunmuştu. NLR ve PLR ise kontrol grubuna kıyasla anlamlı derecede yüksekti10. Bir meta-analizde, NLR’nin klinik seyir ve akut apandisit tanısında etkili olduğu bildirilmiştir11. Pediatrik akut apandisit hastalarında yapılan bir çalışmada, NLR ve NLPR’nin hastalarda istatistiksel olarak yüksek bulunduğu ve bu oranların tanıda kullanılabileceği belirtilmiştir12. Literatürde, farklı sonuçlar da elde edilmiştir2,13. Komplike ve komplike olmayan akut apandisit olgularında NLR ve PLR’nin karşılaştırıldığı bir çalışmada, bizim çalışmamızın aksine, NLR ve PLR’nin komplike akut apandisit olgularında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur2. Ribeiro ve ark.’nın13 akut apandisitli 841 hastanın dahil edildiği bir çalışmada, komplike akut apandisit olgularında lökosit değeri ve NLR, basit akut apandisit olgularına kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur. Uludağ ve ark.’nın17 702 akut apandisit hastasını içeren bir çalışmasında, hastaların %10’unda perforasyon geliştiği bulunmuş ve NLR ve PLR’nin perforasyon gelişen hasta grubunda, non-perfore akut apandisit hastalarına kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır. Akut apandisit dışında, sepsis14, COVID-1915, majör cerrahi sonrası böbrek hasarı16, pnömoni18, spondilartropati gibi enflamatuvar hastalıklar19, dekompense kalp yetmezliği20, kontrast nefropatisi21, küçük cerrahi ve hatta psikiyatrik hastalıklar22 ile hematolojik parametrelerin ilişkisi değerlendirildi. Yüz yetmiş üç sepsis tanılı hastanın dahil edildiği bir çalışmada, mortalitenin %38’e yakın olduğu bulunmuş ve 5. günde nötrofil ve trombosit değerleri ile mortalite arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Aynı çalışmada, 5. günde hesaplanan NLR ve NLPR’nin de mortalite ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişkisi bulunmuştur14. COVID-19 tanısı konmuş hastalarda hematolojik parametrelerin incelendiği bir çalışmada 500 hasta dahil edilmiş ve nötrofil ve trombosit değerleri ile hastalık şiddeti arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır, ancak lenfosit, ciddi COVID-19 hastalarında hafif COVID-19 hastalarına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşüktü. NLR ve NLPR, ciddi COVID-19 hastalarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksekti15. Majör karın cerrahisi sonrası akut böbrek hasarı gelişimi incelendiğinde, postoperatif nötrofil ve trombosit değerleri ile akut böbrek hasarı gelişimi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. Ancak, düşük lenfosit sayısı ve yüksek NLPR ile akut böbrek hasarı gelişimi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur16. Yatan, ayakta tedavi edilen ve kontrol grubu olan pnömoni hastalarının incelendiği bir çalışmada, CRP, NLR ve PLR’nin yatan ve ayakta hasta gruplarında kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aynı çalışmada, yatan ve ayakta tedavi edilen hasta grupları arasında CRP, NLR ve PLR açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır18. Spondilartropatiyi inceleyen bir çalışmada, NLR ve PLR’nin ciddi sakroiliitli hastalarda bağımsız belirleyiciler olarak kabul edilebileceği bildirilmiştir19. Dekompense kalp yetmezliği olan hastalarda kalp ölümlerini değerlendiren bir çalışmada, NLR ve PLR’nin kalp ölümlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur20. Kontrast nefropatisi ile hematolojik parametreler arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen bir çalışmada, akut koroner sendromlu hastaların dahil edildiği Türkiye’de yapılan bir çalışmada, nötrofil lenfosit ve trombosit değerlerinin kontrast nefropatisi gelişimi ile ilişkili olmadığı bulunmuştur. NLR ve NLPR’nin de kontrast nefropatisi gelişimi ile ilişkili olmadığı bulunmuştur23. Septorinoplasti geçiren hastaların incelendiği prospektif bir çalışmada, yüksek postoperatif periorbital ekimoz skoru olan hastalarda lenfosit istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşüktü; nötrofil ve trombosit değerleri ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Yüksek periorbital ekimoz skoru ile NLR arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. PLR ise, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksekti22. Şizofreni tanısı konmuş hastaların sağlıklı kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırıldığı bir çalışmada, nötrofiller ve lenfositlerin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Trombosit ve NLR ile şizofrenik hastalar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. PLR’nin erkek hastalarda kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük olduğu bulunmuştur22. Akut kolesistitli hastalarda hematolojik parametrelerin kısa vadeli mortaliteyi tahmin etme yeteneğini değerlendiren Türkiye’de yapılan bir çalışmada, sağ kalanlar ile hayatta kalanlar arasında NLR açısından önemli bir fark bulunmuş, ancak PLR açısından bir fark bulunmamıştır. Ayrıca, değerlendirilen kombinasyonlu hematolojik parametreler arasında en yüksek AUC değeri 0,708 olan NLR olmuştur24. Çalışmamızda, akut apandisit tanısında yüksek NLR, PLR ve NLPR düzeylerinin, yüksek nötrofil ve düşük lenfosit düzeylerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir; trombosit düzeyinin tanıda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Nötrofil, lenfosit ve trombosit düzeylerinin komplike ve komplike olmayan akut apandisit ayırımında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı belirlenmiştir.

Çalışmanın Kısıtlılıkları

Çalışmamız retrospektif olarak planlandığından, hastaların klinik seyri hastane kayıtlarından elde edilmiştir. Dahil edilen hastalar 18 yaşından büyük olmasına rağmen, genç hastalardan oluşmuşlardır ve komplike akut apandisit tanısı konmuş hasta sayısı azdır.

CONCLUSION

NLR, PLR and NLPR can be used as predictors for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but according to our study, NLR, PLR and NLPR should not be used as prognostic indicators of acute appendicitis.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The instant study was carried out with the permission of the Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital Local Ethics Committee (date: 24/04/2023, decision no: B.10.1.TKH.4.34.H.GP.0.01/131).
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices - Concept - Design - Data Collection or Processing - Analysis or Interpretation - Literature Search - Writing: A.Ö., S.Ö., H.Ş.A., M.T.A.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27.
2
Akça MT, Akça HŞ, Özkan A, Özdemir S. Evaluation of the Ability of Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, Platelet (HALP) Score and Modified HALP Score to Predict Complicated Acute Appendicitis. IJOHSON. 2023;3:13-21.
3
Rothrock SG, Skeoch G, Rush JJ, Johnson NE. Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:45-50.
4
Lurie S, Rahamim E, Piper I, Golan A, Sadan O. Total and differential leukocyte counts percentiles in normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136:16-9.
5
Sanders NL, Bollinger RR, Lee R, Thomas S, Parker W. Appendectomy and Clostridium difficile colitis: relationships revealed by clinical observations and immunology. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5607-14.
6
Marshall JC. Inflammation, coagulopathy, and the pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:S99-106.
7
Abu Alfeilat M, Slotki I, Shavit L. Single emergency room measurement of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for early detection of acute kidney injury (AKI). Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13:717-25.
8
Akilli NB, Yortanlı M, Mutlu H, Günaydın YK, Koylu R, Akca HS, et al. Prognostic importance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in critically ill patients: short- and long-term outcomes. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:1476-80.
9
Akoglu EU, Özdemir S, Ak R, Oztürk TC. The discriminative power of inflammatory markers in patients with mild-to-moderate acute pancreatitis: mean platelet volume, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, and neutrophilmonocyte product. South Clin Ist Euras. 2021;32:159-64.
10
Yazar FM, Bakacak M, Emre A, Urfalıoglu A, Serin S, Cengiz E, et al. Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios for diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015;31:591-6.
11
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hobbs N, Mansour M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts acute appendicitis and distinguishes between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2020;219:154-63.
12
Gedik MS, Hakkoymaz H. The place of delta neutrophil index (immature granulocyte) and hematological markers in diagnosing pediatric acute appendicitis. Annals of Medical Research. 2023;30:399-403.
13
Ribeiro AM, Romero I, Pereira CC, Soares F, Gonçalves Á, Costa S, et al. Inflammatory parameters as predictive factors for complicated appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;74:103266.
14
Shi Y, Yang C, Chen L, Cheng M, Xie W. Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet ratio in in-hospital mortality in septic patients. Heliyon. 2022;8:e11498.
15
Segalo S, Kiseljakovic E, Papic E, Joguncic A, Pasic A, Sahinagic M, et al. The Role of Hemogram-derived Ratios in COVID-19 Severity Stratification in a Primary Healthcare Facility. Acta Inform Med. 2023;31:41-7.
16
Gameiro J, Fonseca JA, Dias JM, Milho J, Rosa R, Jorge S, et al. Neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet ratio as a predictor of postoperative acute kidney injury in major abdominal surgery. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:320.
17
Uludağ SS, Akıncı O, Güreş N, Tunç E, Erginöz E, Şanlı AN, et al. Effectiveness of pre-operative routine blood tests in predicting complicated acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022;28:1590-6.
18
Kartal O, Kartal AT. Value of neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios in pneumonia. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2017;118:513-6.
19
Sen R, Kim E, Napier RJ, Cheng E, Fernandez A, Manning ES, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Biomarkers in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Observational Studies From the Program to Understand the Longterm Outcomes in Spondyloarthritis Registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75:232-41.
20
Tamaki S, Nagai Y, Shutta R, Masuda D, Yamashita S, Seo M, et al. Combination of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios as a Novel Predictor of Cardiac Death in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e026326.
21
Avcı E, Akgün DE, Buğra O, Dolapoğlu A, Çelik A, Kırış T. Combined Value of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and the CHA2DS2-VASc Score for Predicting Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Were Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Kosuyolu Heart Journal. 2018;21:211-6.
22
Šagud M, Madžarac Z, Nedic Erjavec G, Šimunović Filipčić I, Mikulić FL, Rogić D, et al. The Associations of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte, Platelet-Lymphocyte, Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratios and Immune-Inflammation Index with Negative Symptoms in Patients with Schizophrenia. Biomolecules. 2023;13:297.
23
Celik C. A comparison of on-admission blood cell count-derived parameters on the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in acute coronary syndromes. Med-Science. 2023;12:296.
24
Özdemir S, Altunok İ, Özkan A, Mehmet-Muzaffer İ, Abdullah A, Serkan-Emre E, et al. The role of the hematological inflammatory index and systemic immuno-inflammation index in acute cholecystitis. Eur J Clin Exp Med. 2022;20:330-5.