Investigation of Antibacterial Activity of Curcumin and Synergistic Effect with Gentamicin Sulfate

Bensu BAYLAN; Berna ERDAL

doi:10.4274/nkmj.galenos.2024.18199

ABSTRACT

Aim:

In this study; it was aimed to examine the antibacterial activities and synergistic effects of curcumin, a phytotherapeutic agent, and gentamicin sulfate on bacteria.

Materials and Methods:

Antibacterial activity of different concentrations of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate on Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Proteus vulgaris ATCC 3851, Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and tested by disc diffusion methods. The synergistic effects of combinations of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate were examined by checkerboard test.

Results:

It was found that antibacterial activity was seen in all bacteria and the lowest MIC was 7.81 μg/mL in E. faecalis for curcumin and 0.08 μg/mL in K. pneumoniae for gentamicin sulfate. As a result of the disk diffusion test, inhibition zone diameters were detected at concentrations of 32 and 16 mg/mL in all bacteria tested. As a result of the checkerboard test, an additive effect was observed in four of the bacteria (P. vulgaris, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus) and a indifferent effect was observed in three of them (P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis). The finding of the lowest fractional inhibitor concentration index (FICI=0.75) in B. cereus, one of the gram-positive bacteria, was interpreted as the combination of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate having a partial synergistic effect.

Conclusion:

This study is the first to evaluate the synergistic effect of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate. Antibacterial activity results suggest that curcumin can be used as an alternative agent in the treatment of bacterial infections. However, in order to clearly determine the effect of both the antibacterial activity of curcumin and its synergy with gentamicin sulfate during the treatment process, these results need to be supported by large-scale in vitro and in vivo studies that will include clinical isolates.

Keywords:

Curcumin, gentamicin sulfate, antibacterial activity, synergistic effect, checkerboard test

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial infections are one of the major causes of chronic infections and mortality. Antibiotics used in the treatment of these infections are preferred due to their potent effects. However, it is also known that the widespread use of antibiotics leads to the emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacterial strains¹. In recent years, the increase in infections caused by resistant strains has attracted attention. MDR bacteria show resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics. High morbidity and mortality rates are observed in diseases caused by these bacteria².

In order to prevent the increase in antibiotic resistance, there is a need for antimicrobial compounds that can be used as an alternative to conventional antibiotic therapy. This has led to the discovery of new natural or synthetic antimicrobial compounds³. The side effects of synthetic drugs have led to a growing interest in natural plant-derived antimicrobial agents and a growing interest in treating infections naturally⁴. Natural products are also being investigated in combination therapies to manage antibiotic resistance. Synergistic studies are expected to be important in the future to overcome antimicrobial resistance⁵.

Curcumin is a food spice that is a natural component of Curcuma longa (turmeric, turmeric) rhizomes. It has been widely used as a medicine in the treatment of various diseases in Asian and Middle Eastern countries for years⁶. Curcumin, also known as turmeric, has been shown to have antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities^7-9. In the society, it is known to be used for therapeutic purposes against various malignant diseases, diabetes, arthritis, gastritis, urinary tract infections, skin diseases and other chronic diseases¹⁰. Studies have shown that combinations of curcumin with different agents, including various antibiotics, have synergistic effects against bacteria^11-13.

The aim of this study was to determine the antibacterial activities of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate, an antimicrobial drug, against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It was also planned to investigate the synergistic effects of gentamicin sulfate, which is used in clinical applications, when combined with a phytotherapeutic agent such as curcumin as well as its effects alone.

GİRİŞ

Bakteriyel enfeksiyonlar, kronik enfeksiyonların ve ölümLerin önemLi nedenlerinden biridir. Bu enfeksiyonların tedavisinde kullanılan antibiyotikler güçlü etkileri nedeniyle tercih edilmektedir. Ancak antibiyotiklerin yaygın kullanımının çoklu ilaca dirençli (multiple drug resistance) bakteri suşlarının ortaya çıkmasına yol açtığı da bilinmektedir¹. Son yıllarda dirençli suşların neden olduğu enfeksiyonlardaki artış dikkat çekmektedir. Çoklu ilaca dirençli bakteriler, üç veya daha fazla antibiyotik sınıfına direnç gösterirler. Bu bakterilerin neden olduğu hastalıklarda yüksek morbidite ve mortalite oranları görülmektedir².

Antibiyotik direncindeki artışın önlenmesi adına klasik antibiyotik tedavisine alternatif olarak kullanılabilecek antimikrobiyal bileşiklere ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu da yeni doğal veya sentetik antimikrobiyal bileşiklerin keşfedilmesine neden olmaktadır³. Sentetik ilaçların oluşturduğu yan etkiler bu durumu bitkisel kaynaklı doğal antimikrobiyal ajanlara yönlendirmiştir ve enfeksiyonların doğal yollarla tedavi edilmesine karşı artan bir ilgi oluşturmuştur⁴. Doğal ürünler antibiyotik direncini yönetmek için kombine tedavilerde de araştırılmaktadır. Yapılan sinerjistik çalışmaların antimikrobiyal direncin üstesinden gelmek amacıyla gelecekte önemli olacağı düşünülmektedir⁵.

Kurkumin, Curcuma longa (turmerik, zerdeçal) rizomlarının doğal bileşeni olan bir gıda baharatıdır. Asya ve Orta Doğu ülkelerinde yıllardır çeşitli hastalıkların tedavisinde yaygın bir ilaç olarak kullanılmaktadır⁶. Zerdeçal olarak da bilinen kurkuminin antibakteriyel, antifungal, antiviral, antioksidan, anti-enflamatuvar ve antikanser aktivitelerinin olduğu gösterilmiştir^7-9. Halk arasında çeşitli malign hastalıklar, diyabet, artrit, gastrit, idrar yolu enfeksiyonları, deri hastalıkları ve diğer kronik hastalıklara karşı terapötik amaçlı kullanıldığı bilinmektedir¹⁰. Yapılan çalışmalarda kurkuminin çeşitli antibiyotikler dahil olmak üzere farklı ajanlarla kombinasyonlarının bakterilere karşı sinerjistik etkili olduğu gösterilmiştir^11-13.

Bu çalışmada; kurkuminin ve antimikrobiyal bir ilaç olan gentamisin sülfatın çeşitli Gram-pozitif ve Gram-negatif bakteriler üzerine antibakteriyel aktivitelerinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Ayrıca klinik uygulamalarda kullanılan gentamisin sülfatın tek başına etkilerinin yanı sıra kurkumin gibi fitoterapötik bir ajan ile kombine edildiğinde oluşabilecek sinerjistik etkilerinin araştırılması planlandı.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was reviewed and approved by Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Non-interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no: 2022.68.04.18, date: 26.07.2022).

Bacteria Strains

Gram-negative bacteria of Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Proteus vulgaris ATCC 3851 and Gram-positive bacteria of Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 strains were used in the study. Before each experiment, bacterial strains were inoculated on 5% sheep blood agar (BESLAB, Turkey) and incubated at 37 °C for 18-20 hours.

Preparation of Curcumin and Gentamicin Sulfate Stock Solutions

Curcumin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was weighed 0.00154 g at a concentration of 1000 µg/mL, dissolved in 200 µL 0.5 M sodium hydroxide and 800 µL phosphate buffered saline, filtered and diluted with Mueller Hinton Broth (Himedia, India). Gentamicin sulfate (Biological Industries, Israel) was diluted 1:5000 at a stock concentration of 10 µg/mL and dilutions were prepared.

Determination of Antibacterial Activity

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration Test

Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for each bacterial strain were performed by liquid microdilution method according to EUCAST recommendations¹⁴. Serial dilutions of curcumin (1000-1.95 µg/mL) and gentamicin sulfate (10-0.019 µg/mL) were performed in 96-well U-bottom microplates. Bacterial suspensions were diluted to 5x10⁵ CFU/mL and 10 µL each was added to the wells. Positive (growth) and negative (sterility) control wells were also prepared in microplates. Microplates were incubated at 35±1 ºC for 18-20 hours. The results were evaluated visually and by spectrophotometer reading. The lowest concentration without growth was considered as the MIC value. Each test was repeated three times.

Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Test

Bacterial concentrations where no growth was observed at the end of incubation were evaluated as minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) value. In the minimum bactericidal concentration test study, firstly, the wells for which the MIC test was completed and no growth was observed were identified. 2 μL of Mueller Hinton Agar (Merck, Germany) was inoculated from the non-growing wells. The medium plates were incubated at 35±1 ºC for 18-20 hours. Bacterial concentrations at the end of incubation were considered as MBC values.

Disc Diffusion Test

Antibacterial activities of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate were determined using disk diffusion test¹⁵. 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspensions were inoculated on Mueller Hinton Agar. Dilutions of curcumin at concentration ranges of 32-2 mg/mL and gentamicin sulfate at different concentrations selected according to the results of the MIC test were impregnated on 6 mm blank disks (Bioanalyse, Turkey) in 100 μL. Gentamicin (10 µg/mL, Bioanalyse, Turkey) disk was used as a positive control. Petri dishes were then incubated at 35±1 °C for 18-20 hours. Inhibition zone diameters (mm) were measured at the end of incubation. Each test was repeated three times.

Checkerboard Test

The synergistic effect between curcumin and gentamicin sulfate was demonstrated with the checkerboard test¹⁶. Concentrations were determined at four times above (x16 MIC) and three times below (1/8 MIC) the MIC value. Serial dilutions were prepared with curcumin on the vertical axis and gentamicin sulfate on the horizontal axis. In 96-well U-bottom microplates, 100 µL combinations of curcumin (50 µL) and gentamicin sulfate (50 µL) were prepared in each well. The prepared 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspensions were diluted 1:10 and 5 µL was added to each well to ensure a final bacterial concentration of 5x10⁵ CFU/mL. Wells for positive (growth) and negative (sterility) controls were also prepared in microplates. Microplates were incubated at 35±1 °C for 18-20 hours. The results were evaluated visually and spectrophotometrically at 490-630 nm.

The synergy relationship between curcumin and gentamicin sulfate was calculated as fractional inhibitor concentrations (FIC) sums and fractional inhibitor concentration index (FICI) as follows.

Synergy between curcumin and gentamicin sulfate was evaluated by calculating the FICI. If FICI ≤0.5, it was interpreted as synergistic effect; if 0.5 < FICI ≤1, it was interpreted as additive effect; if 1 < FICI ≤4, it was interpreted as differential effect; and if FICI >4, it was interpreted as antagonistic effect¹⁶.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data obtained for the disk diffusion test applied in the study was performed with the GraphPad Prism 8 program. Mean±standard deviation values of inhibition zone diameters were calculated in these experiments performed in triplicate.

RESULTS

Antibacterial Activity Results

In the MIC test, the antibacterial activities of curcumin (1000-1.95 µg/mL) and gentamicin sulfate (10-0.019 µg/mL) were tested on standard reference strains. The results of the MIC and MBC tests are shown in Table 1. It was determined that curcumin was effective in all bacteria tested and generally showed activity at a concentration of 62.5 µg/mL. The antibacterial activity of curcumin was highest in the Gram-positive bacteria E. faecalis (7.81 µg/mL). For gentamicin sulfate, antibacterial activity was found at different concentrations in the tested bacteria. MIC and MBC results were obtained at a concentration of 0.31 µg/mL in three bacteria (B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus). The most sensitive bacteria to gentamicin sulfate was K. pneumoniae, while the most resistant bacteria was E. faecalis. At the same time, it was determined that the MIC and MBC results of gentamicin sulfate were compatible (except E. faecalis).

Disk diffusion test showed that curcumin showed antibacterial activity at concentrations of 32 and 16 mg/mL. Similar zone diameters were obtained at both concentrations. The most sensitive bacteria to curcumin were K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and L. monocytogenes, which formed inhibition zone diameter at 4 mg/mL concentration (Table 2).

As a result of the disk diffusion test, the most sensitive bacteria to gentamicin sulfate were P. aeruginosa, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus. The lowest concentration effective against these bacteria was 0.63 µg/mL. The most resistant bacteria to gentamicin sulfate was E. faecalis (Table 3).

Checkerboard Test Results

Checkerboard test was used to evaluate the synergistic effect between curcumin and gentamicin sulfate. The MIC values of gentamicin sulfate alone and in combination with curcumin are given in Table 4. It was observed that the combination of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate decreased the MIC values in P. vulgaris, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus bacteria (Table 4).

The FIC and FICI values of the bacterial strains tested in the study are given in Table 5. Among the Gram-negative bacteria tested, 1 showed additive effect and 2 showed differential effect, while 3 gram-positive bacteria showed additive effect and 1 showed differential effect. The lowest FICI value (0.75) in B. cereus, a Gram-positive bacterium, suggests that the combination of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate has a partial synergistic effect on this bacterium.

DISCUSSION

The most common treatment for bacterial infections is the use of antibiotics¹⁷. However, due to the increase in antibiotic resistance in recent years, there is a need to discover new therapeutic agents with strong antibacterial activity¹¹. Curcumin is a natural agent whose therapeutic effects have been investigated due to its various biological and medicinal properties¹⁸. In this study investigating the antibacterial activity of curcumin on some standard strains, it was found that curcumin showed antibacterial activity at a concentration of 62.5 µg/mL against all tested bacteria except E. faecalis (7.81 µg/mL). The results of this study and similar studies also emphasize the antibacterial activity of curcumin^19,20. In a study by Ungphaiboon et al. (2005)¹⁹, in which they investigated the antibacterial activity of curcumin extracts obtained from Curcuma longa L. rhizomes on various microorganisms, they found the MIC values of curcumin as 16 and 128 µg/mL for Bacillus subtilis NCTC 10073 and S. aureus ATCC 25923, respectively. On the other hand, they could not detect any activity against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853. Anbari et al. (2021)²⁰ examined the antibacterial effects of curcumin nanoparticles and pure curcumin on S. aureus PTCC 1764. They found that the MIC values of curcumin nanoparticles were in the range of 0.48-0.34 mg/mL, while pure curcumin was 0.56 mg/mL. Compared to pure curcumin, they found that the MIC values of curcumin nanoparticles were lower than pure curcumin due to their smaller size and easier penetration into bacteria. In the studies, it is seen that the MIC values differ in each study due to the preparation of curcumin by different methods, the use of different methods for the determination of antibacterial activity and testing against different microorganism species.

It is known that gentamicin sulfate, an aminoglycoside group, is an agent that shows broad antibacterial activity with low MIC values against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria²¹. In this study, although the MIC values of gentamicin sulfate varied in the bacteria studied, the most resistant bacteria was E. faecalis (2.5 µg/mL) and the most sensitive bacteria was K. pneumoniae (0.08 µg/mL). At the same time, the MBC results were similar to the MIC results (except for E. faecalis). In a similar study, Arisoy et al. (2013)²²found that the highest gentamicin sulfate MIC values were found in ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (1024 µg/mL) and K. pneumoniae (256 µg/mL). Dorati et al.²³ (2018) examined the antibacterial activity of gentamicin sulfate and gentamicin sulfate-loaded nanoparticles in clinical isolates. In the study, they determined the MIC and MBC test results of gentamicin sulfate as 2/4 µg/mL for Escherichia coli, 1/2 µg/mL for P. aeruginosa, 4/8 µg/mL for Proteus mirabilis, 1/1 µg/mL and 8/16 µg/mL for two S. aureus isolates. For the reference strain Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, the MIC/MBK values were 0.5/0.5 µg/mL. As a result of the study, they concluded that there was no difference between the MIC/MBK test results of gentamicin sulfate and gentamicin sulfate loaded nanoparticles.

Disk diffusion test is another method used to investigate antibacterial activity. In the literature, there are limited number of studies investigating the antibacterial activity of curcumin by disk diffusion method^6,24. In this study, disk diffusion test was applied in addition to MIC test. The first two highest concentrations of curcumin, 32 and 16 mg/mL, were found to produce zone diameters of inhibition in all bacteria tested, while large zone diameters were observed at low concentrations of gentamicin sulfate. The limited mobility of bacteria in the disk diffusion test compared to liquid culture in the MIC test may cause the results of these two tests to be different²⁵. Khan et al. (2021)⁶ investigated the antimicrobial activities of curcumin nanoparticles and its aqueous extract (5, 10, 20 mg/mL) by disk diffusion method and used Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 23235 and Aspergillus niger FCBP-PTF0198 strains. They found that the most effective concentration of curcumin nanoparticles and aqueous extract was 20 mg/mL and at this concentration, nanoparticle inhibition zone diameters were higher than aqueous curcumin.

It is thought that synergistic studies will play an important role in the future of antibiotic therapies to overcome antibacterial resistance and prevent new resistance mechanisms⁵. In recent years, the combined use of natural products and antibiotics in the treatment of infectious diseases has come to the fore in order to expand the pool of therapeutic agents and manage emerging resistance. It has been reported that the combination of curcumin, a natural product, with antibiotics increases the membrane permeability of the bacterial cell and facilitates the entry of antibiotics into the cell¹⁸. In this study, the combination of curcumin with gentamicin sulfate decreased the MIC values in P. vulgaris, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus bacteria. In addition, the lowest FICI result (FICI=0.75) in B. cereus was interpreted as a partial synergistic effect of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate. In similar studies, it has been shown that combinations of curcumin with different antibiotics are antibacterial and these combinations can be used for therapeutic purposes^13,26. Bahari et al. (2017)¹³ investigated the synergistic activity of curcumin with azithromycin and gentamicin against P. aeruginosa (PAO1) by checkerboard test and found that the MIC values of the antibiotics alone were higher than the MIC values of the combination with curcumin. As a result of the study, they found that there was a synergistic effect between curcumin and azithromycin (FICI=0.25) and gentamicin (FICI=0.37). Mun et al. (2013)²⁶ showed that the combination of curcumin with oxacillin, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin against eight clinical and two reference MRSA strains reduced the MIC values of these antibiotics and showed synergy/partial synergy between them and curcumin. In studies with curcumin, it is seen that the synergistic effect results vary according to the strain and antimicrobial agent used.

This study shows that curcumin alone or in combination with gentamicin sulfate has antimicrobial activity. However, these results need to be supported by large-scale in vitro and in vivo studies including clinical isolates to clearly determine the effect of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate synergy in the treatment process of bacterial infections.

Study Limitations

The limitation of this study is that the synergistic effects of curcumin and gentamicin sulfate on bacteria isolated from clinical samples were not investigated.

TARTIŞMA

Bakteriyel enfeksiyonlarda en yaygın uygulanan tedavi şekli antibiyotik kullanımıdır¹⁷. Ancak son yıllarda antibiyotik direncindeki artış nedeniyle güçlü antibakteriyel aktiviteye sahip yeni terapötik ajanların keşfedilmesine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır¹¹. Kurkumin, çeşitli biyolojik ve tıbbi özellikleri nedeniyle terapötik etkileri araştırılan doğal bir ajandır¹⁸. Kurkuminin bazı standart suşlar üzerine antibakteriyel aktivitesinin araştırıldığı bu çalışmada, E. faecalis (7,81 µg/mL) hariç test edilen tüm bakteriler üzerine 62,5 µg/mL konsantrasyonda antibakteriyel etkinlik gösterdiği görülmüştür. Bu çalışma ile benzer çalışmaların sonuçları da kurkuminin antibakteriyel etkinliğine vurgu yapmaktadır^19,20. Ungphaiboon ve ark.’nın (2005)¹⁹, Curcuma longa L. Rizomlarından elde ettikleri kurkumin ekstraktlarının çeşitli mikroorganizmalar üzerine antibakteriyel aktivitelerini inceledikleri bir çalışmada; kurkuminin MİK değerlerini Bacillus subtilis NCTC 10073 ve S. aureus ATCC 25923 için sırasıyla 16 ve 128 µg/mL olarak bulmuşlardır. Bunun yanında Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 ve P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 üzerine aktivite tespit edememişlerdir. Anbari ve ark. (2021)²⁰ kurkumin nanopartiküllerinin ve saf kurkuminin S. aureus PTCC 1764 üzerine antibakteriyel etkilerini incelemişlerdir. Kurkumin nanopartiküllerinin MİK değerlerinin 0,48-0,34 mg/mL aralığında olduğunu, saf kurkuminin ise 0,56 mg/mL olduğunu bulmuşlardır. Saf kurkumin ile karşılaştırıldığında kurkumin nanopartiküllerinin boyutlarının daha küçük olması ve bakteriye daha kolay penetre olması nedeniyle MİK değerlerinin saf kurkuminden daha düşük olduğunu tespit etmişlerdir. Çalışmalarda kurkuminin farklı yöntemLer ile hazırlanması, antibakteriyel aktivite tayini için farklı yöntemLerin kullanılması ve farklı mikroorganizma türlerine karşı test edilmesi nedeniyle MİK değerlerinin her çalışmada farklılık gösterdiği görülmektedir.

Aminoglikozit grubu olan gentamisin sülfatın, Gram-pozitif ve Gram-negatif bakterilere karşı düşük MİK değerleri ile geniş antibakteriyel etkinlik gösteren bir ajan olduğu bilinmektedir²¹. Bu çalışmada gentamisin sülfatın MİK değerleri çalışılan bakterilerde farklılık göstermekle birlikte en dirençli bakterinin E. faecalis (2,5 µg/mL), en duyarlı bakterinin ise K. pneumoniae (0,08 µg/mL) olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aynı zamanda MBK sonuçlarının MİK sonuçları ile benzer olduğu (E. faecalis hariç) görülmüştür. Arisoy ve ark. (2013)²² yaptığı benzer bir çalışmada en yüksek gentamisin sülfat MİK değerlerinin ESBL üreten Escherichia coli (1024 µg/mL) ve K. pneumoniae (256 µg/mL) izolatlarında olduğunu tespit etmişlerdir. Dorati ve ark. (2018)²³, gentamisin sülfatın ve gentamisin sülfat yüklü nanopartiküllerin antibakteriyel aktivitelerini klinik izolatlarda incelemişlerdir. Çalışmada gentamisin sülfatın MİK ve MBK test sonuçlarını Escherichia coli için 2/4 µg/mL, P. aeruginosa için 1/2 µg/mL, Proteus mirabilis için 4/8 µg/mL, iki adet S. aureus izolatları için 1/1 µg/mL ve 8/16 µg/mL olarak belirlemişlerdir. Referans suş Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 için ise MİK/MBK değerlerini 0,5/0,5 µg/mL bulmuşlardır. Çalışma sonucunda gentamisin sülfat ile gentamisin sülfat yüklü nanopartiküllerin MİK/MBK test sonuçları arasında farklılık olmadığı sonucuna varmışlardır.

Disk difüzyon testi antibakteriyel aktivitenin araştırılmasında kullanılan bir diğer yöntemdir. Literatürde kurkuminin disk difüzyon yöntemiyle antibakteriyel aktivitesini araştıran sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır^6,24. Yapılan bu çalışmada MİK testine ek olarak disk difüzyon testi de uygulanmıştır. Kurkuminin en yüksek ilk iki konsantrasyon olan 32 ve 16 mg/mL’de test edilen tüm bakterilerde inhibisyon zon çapı oluşturduğu görülürken, gentamisin sülfatın düşük konsantrasyonlarında geniş zon çapları görülmüştür. MİK testindeki sıvı kültüre kıyasla disk difüzyon testinde bakteri hareketliliğinin kısıtlı olması, bu iki testin sonuçlarının farklı çıkmasına neden olabilmektedir²⁵. Khan ve ark.’nın (2021)⁶ kurkumin nanopartiküllerinin ve sulu ekstraktının (5, 10, 20 mg/mL) antimikrobiyal aktivitelerini disk difüzyon metodu ile araştırdıkları bir çalışmada; Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 23235 ve Aspergillus niger FCBP-PTF0198 suşları kullanılmıştır. Kurkumin nanopartiküllerinin ve sulu ekstraktının en etkili konsantrasyonunun 20 mg/mL olduğu ve bu konsantrasyonda nanopartikül inhibisyon zon çaplarının sulu kurkumine göre daha fazla olduğunu bulmuşlardır.

Antibakteriyel direncin üstesinden gelmek ve yeni direnç mekanizmalarını önlemek amacıyla antibiyotik tedavilerinin geleceğinde sinerjistik çalışmaların önemLi bir rol oynayacağı düşünülmektedir⁵. Son yıllarda terapötik ajan havuzunu genişletmek ve oluşan direnci yönetmek için enfeksiyon hastalıklarının tedavisinde doğal ürünler ile antibiyotiklerin kombine kullanımı gündeme gelmiştir. Doğal bir ürün olan kurkuminin antibiyotikler ile kombine kullanımının bakteri hücresinin zar geçirgenliğini artırdığı ve antibiyotiklerin hücre içine girişini kolaylaştırdığı ifade edilmektedir¹⁸. Bu çalışmada kurkuminin gentamisin sülfat ile kombinasyonunun P. vulgaris, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes ve S. aureus bakterilerinde MİK değerlerini azalttığı görülmüştür. Ek olarak B. cereus’ta en düşük FİKİ sonucunun (FİKİ=0,75) bulunması, kurkumin ile gentamisin sülfatın kısmi sinerjistik etkili olabileceği şeklinde yorumLanmıştır. Yapılan benzer çalışmalarda kurkuminin farklı antibiyotiklerle kombinasyonlarının antibakteriyel etkili olduğu ve bu kombinasyonların terapötik amaçlı kullanılabileceği gösterilmiştir^13,26. Bahari ve ark. (2017)¹³; P. aeruginosa’ya (PAO1) karşı kurkuminin azitromisin ve gentamisin ile sinerjistik aktivitesini dama tahtası testi ile araştırmışlar ve antibiyotiklerin tek başına olan MİK değerlerinin kurkumin ile kombinasyon sonucu MİK değerlerinden yüksek olduğunu tespit etmişlerdir. Çalışma sonucunda kurkumin ile azitromisin (FİKİ=0,25) ve gentamisin (FİKİ=0,37) arasında sinerjistik etki olduğunu bulmuşlardır. Mun ve ark. (2013)²⁶ sekiz klinik ve iki referans MRSA suşuna karşı kurkuminin; oksasilin, ampisilin, siprofloksasin ve norfloksasin ile kombinasyonlarının bu antibiyotiklerin MİK değerlerini azalttığı ve kurkumin ile aralarında sinerji/kısmi sinerji olduğunu göstermişlerdir. Kurkumin ile yapılan çalışmalarda sinerjistik etki sonuçlarının kullanılan suşa ve antimikrobiyal ajana göre değiştiği görülmektedir.

Bu çalışma kurkuminin tek başına veya gentamisin sülfat ile kombine kullanımının antimikrobiyal aktiviteye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak kurkumin ve gentamisin sülfat sinerjisinin bakteriyel enfeksiyonlarda tedavi sürecindeki etkisini net olarak belirlemek adına bu sonuçların klinik izolatların dahil edileceği geniş ölçekli in vitro ve in vivo çalışmalarla desteklenmesi gerekmektedir.

Çalışmanın Kısıtlılıkları

Klinik örneklerden izole edilen bakteriler üzerine kurkumin ve gentamisin sülfatın sinerjistik etkilerinin araştırılmaması bu çalışmanın kısıtlayıcı yanıdır.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the use of different natural therapeutic agents in combination with antibiotics in the empirical treatment of bacterial infections seems promising in terms of reducing the toxicity of antibiotics and increasing their antimicrobial efficacy.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was reviewed and approved by Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no: 2022.68.04.18, date: 26.07.2022).

Informed Consent: It is a laboratory study that does not require patient consent.

Authorship Contributions:

Concept: B.B., B.E., Design: B.B., B.E., Data Collection or Processing: B.B., B.E., Analysis or Interpretation: B.B., B.E., Literature Search: B.B., B.E., Writing: B.B., B.E.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Financial Disclosure: No financial support was received from any institution or individual for our study.

References

Wang L, Hu C, Shao L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1227-49.

Jubeh B, Breijyeh Z, Karaman R. Antibacterial Prodrugs to Overcome Bacterial Resistance. Molecules. 2020;25:1543.

Lagedroste M, Reiners J, Smits SHJ, Schmitt L. Systematic characterization of position one variants within the lantibiotic nisin. Sci Rep. 2019;9:935.

Ghavimi MA, Shahi S, Maleki Dizaj S, Sharifi S, Noie Alamdari A, Jamei Khosroshahi AR, et al. Antimicrobial effects of nanocurcumin gel on reducing the microbial count of gingival fluids of implant‒abutment interface: A clinical study. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2022;14:114-8.

Wencewicz TA. Crossroads of Antibiotic Resistance and Biosynthesis. J Mol Biol. 2019;431:3370-99.

Khan MA, Moghul NB, Butt MA, Kiyani MM, Zafar I, Bukhari AI. Assessment of antibacterial and antifungal potential of Curcuma longa and synthesized nanoparticles: A comparative study. J Basic Microbiol. 2021;61:603-11.

Gugleva V, Michailova V, Mihaylova R, Momekov G, Zaharieva MM, Najdenski H, et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Hybrid Niosomal In Situ Gel for Intravesical Co-Delivery of Curcumin and Gentamicin Sulfate. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:747.

Chen Y, Lu Y, Lee RJ, Xiang G. Nano Encapsulated Curcumin: And Its Potential for Biomedical Applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:3099-120.

Karthikeyan A, Senthil N, Min T. Nanocurcumin: A Promising Candidate for Therapeutic Applications. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:487.

Dosoky NS, Setzer WN. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Essential Oils of Curcuma Species. Nutrients. 2018;10:1196.

Song Z, Wu Y, Wang H, Han H. Synergistic antibacterial effects of curcumin modified silver nanoparticles through ROS-mediated pathways. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;99:255-63.

Kali A, Bhuvaneshwar D, Charles PM, Seetha KS. Antibacterial synergy of curcumin with antibiotics against biofilm producing clinical bacterial isolates. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016;7:93-6.

Bahari S, Zeighami H, Mirshahabi H, Roudashti S, Haghi F. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing by subinhibitory concentrations of curcumin with gentamicin and azithromycin. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;10:21-8.

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). EUCAST reading guide for broth microdilution. Version. 4.0.2022.

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). EUCAST disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Version.11.0.2023.

Catteau L, Reichmann NT, Olson J, Pinho MG, Nizet V, Van Bambeke F, et al. Synergy between Ursolic and Oleanolic Acids from Vitellaria paradoxa Leaf Extract and β-Lactams against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In Vitro and In Vivo Activity and Underlying Mechanisms. Molecules. 2017;22:2245.

Feng Y, Coradi Tonon C, Ashraf S, Hasan T. Photodynamic and antibiotic therapy in combination against bacterial infections: efficacy, determinants, mechanisms, and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;177:113941.

Tyagi P, Singh M, Kumari H, Kumari A, Mukhopadhyay K. Bactericidal activity of curcumin I is associated with damaging of bacterial membrane. PloS One. 2015;10:e0121313.

Ungphaiboon S, Tanomjit S, Pechnoi S, Supreedee Sungkarak, Pranee Rattanasuwan, Itharat Arunporn. Study on antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of turmeric clear liquid soap for wound treatment of HIV patients. Songklanakarin J Sci and Technol. 2005;27:569-78.

Anbari H, Maghsoudi A, Hosseinpour M, Yazdian F. Acceleration of antibacterial activity of curcumin loaded biopolymers against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Synthesis, optimization, and evaluation. Eng Life Sci. 2021;22:58-69.

Chevallier P, Wiggers HJ, Copes F, Zorzi Bueno C, Mantovani D. Prolonged Antibacterial Activity in Tannic Acid-Iron Complexed Chitosan Films for Medical Device Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023;13:484.

Arisoy M, Temiz-Arpaci O, Kaynak-Onurdag F, Ozgen S. Novel benzoxazoles: synthesis and antibacterial, antifungal, and antitubercular activity against antibiotic-resistant and -sensitive microbes. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2013;68:453-60.

Dorati R, DeTrizio A, Spalla M, Migliavacca R, Pagani L, Pisani S, et al. Gentamicin Sulfate PEG-PLGA/PLGA-H Nanoparticles: Screening Design and Antimicrobial Effect Evaluation toward Clinic Bacterial Isolates. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018;8:37.

Lawhavinit O, Kongkathip N, Kongkathip B. Antimicrobial Activity of Curcuminoids from Curcuma longa L. on Pathogenic Bacteria of Shrimp and Chicken. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci). 2010;44:364-71.

Teow SY, Ali SA. Synergistic antibacterial activity of Curcumin with antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015;28:2109-14.

Mun SH, Joung DK, Kim YS, Kang OH, Kim SB, Seo YS, et al. Synergistic antibacterial effect of curcumin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytomedicine. 2013;20:714-8.