EN | TR
E-ISSN: 2587-0262
The Effect of Uric Acid/Albumin Ratio on Prognosis of Patients Followed Up with COVID-19 Diagnosis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 13 ISSUE: 2
P: 125 - 132
June 2025

The Effect of Uric Acid/Albumin Ratio on Prognosis of Patients Followed Up with COVID-19 Diagnosis

Namik Kemal Med J 2025;13(2):125-132
Başak ÇAKIR GÜNEY 1
İrfan KÜÇÜK 2
Bünyamin GÜNEY 3
Nurgül TÜKEL 1
Zeliha SERİNDAĞ 1
Yeşim ÖNAL TAŞTAN 1
Ahmet Emre KALAMAN 1
Mustafa KAPLAN 4
1. Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Internal Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gastroenterology, İstanbul, Türkiye
3. İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
4. Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gastroenterology, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 26.12.2024
Accepted Date: 13.03.2025
Online Date: 23.06.2025
Publish Date: 23.06.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the uric acid to albumin ratio (UAR) on prognosis in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients followed up in the intensive care unit (ICU) and wards.

Materials and Methods

A single center, retrospective study was organized to observe the UAR values of 204 COVID-19 patients (>18 years of age) hospitalized at the Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital between May 1, 2020 and April 1, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to UAR, as low and high UAR groups, using Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis to determine the optimal cut-off value for UAR. The cut-off value was determined as 1.63. Demographic clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of the participants during their hospitalization were retrospectively obtained from the hospital’s electronic medical records.

Results

Patients with high UAR (≥1.63) required longer ICU hospitalization (14.5% vs. 51%, p<0.001) and showed higher in-hospital mortality (0.05% vs. 43.5%, p<0.001).

Conclusion

In this study, we have concluded that UAR is a useful tool independent of other parameters in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 followed in ICU and wards.

Keywords:
UAR, COVID-19, prognosis, mortality

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in China in December 2019 and was accepted by the World Health Organization as a pandemic caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on March 11, 2020, and has caused the death of millions of people since its emergence1, 2. While most of the COVID-19 patients recover without any complications, a significant number of patients face serious complications and death. Patients with COVID-19 present with a variety of symptoms as well as different prognoses, including recovery, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. While only fever and cough can be seen in mild cases, critical cases can be seen in various presentation such as Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), sepsis or septic shock. Early detection of high-risk patients likely to develop critical illness is essential to allocate limited resources to treat the disease3.

It is known that immunosuppression, malignancy, diabetes, and hypertension (HT) adversely affect the prognosis in COVID-19 patients and cause high mortality4. A severe and uncontrolled immune inflammatory response is an effective predictor of disease severity and poor prognosis. Many different serological markers have been identified as the indicators of inflammatory response. In previous studies, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), ferritin, proinflammatory cytokines in addition to lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I were determined to be predictors of serious morbidity and mortality5-7. Albumin is an important molecule in the body’s defense mechanisms, which plays a role in antiinflammation, antiapoptosis and protection of the body from oxidative stress8, 9. Low albumin level was also found to be significant in predicting disease severity and mortality in previous studies10-13.

Uric acid (UA) is a catabolic product of purine from RNA and DNA as a metabolic index, it is less affected by other factors than drugs and high purine diet. Previous studies have shown that UA is closely related to the activation of the immune system and scavenging of free oxygen radicals14-16. High UA levels can be detected in chronic diseases such as HT, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and gout. In addition, hyperuricemia was found to be associated with increased mortality in these diseases17, 18. It has been reported that kidney and gastrointestinal involvement rates are high in COVID-19 patients. Since the kidneys and intestines are both targets of SARS-CoV2 and primary sites of UA excretion, serum UA concentrations have been shown to be lower in patients with COVID-19 disease. Hypouricemia has also been found to be strongly associated with poor prognosis and mortality19-23. However, it is known that hyperuricemia is associated with hypoxia and systemic inflammation in respiratory tract diseases, and some studies have found that both hyperuricemia and hypouricemia are associated with increased mortality3, 24.

In recent studies, systemic immune inflammatory indices such as neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte lymphocyte ratio and systemic inflammatory index (SII) have been shown to be useful in predicting disease severity and mortality in COVID-1925-27. Uric acid to albumin ratio (UAR) is an index that has been shown to predict prognosis in many diseases such as acute renal failure, pneumonia, and acute coronary diseases, and unlike these diseases, there is no study conducted in COVID-19 patients. In this study, we planned to investigate the effect of UAR on prognosis in COVID-19 patients followed in ICU and other wards28-30.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient Selection

COVID-19 patients (>18 years old), hospitalized at the Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital in the internal medicine clinic between May 1, 2020 and April 1, 2022 were the main focus of this single-center, retrospective study. COVID-19 diagnoses were made by a positive result from a real-time reverse transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens. Patients who had negative RT-PCR results or patients using drugs to decrease serum UA level and patients under 18 years old were excluded from the study. Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from the University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Hamidiye Clinical Research Ethics Committee (decision no: E-46418926-050.99-133138, date: 31.05.2022).

Statistical Analysis

The power analysis of the study was performed with G*Power 3.1.9.4. When the effect size d: 0.5, α err prob: 0.04, Power (1-β error prob): 0.964, the total sample size was found to be 204. For the study, 364 patients who were followed up with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were screened and patients with undesirable UA levels during hospitalization were excluded from the study. When the number of 204 patients identified after power analysis was reached, data collection was terminated through the system. The patients were divided into two groups according to UAR as the low and high UAR groups.

The demographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of the participants during their hospitalization were retrospectively obtained from the hospital’s electronic medical records. The duration of follow up in the ICU, the treatments they received, and the duration and doses of these treatments were recorded.

Laboratory Analysis

Blood samples were obtained on the first day of the Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Education and Research Hospital admission. Immediately after sampling, complete blood count parameters were determined by a hematology analyzer (ABX Pentra DX 120). Serum UA and albumin levels were measured using a Roche Diagnostics Cobas 8000 c502 analyzer (Roche Holding AG, Basel, Switzerland). Serum albumin level was determined using the bromocresol green method.

ICU Evaluation Criteria

The patients were admitted to the ICU according to the following criteria: 1) Meeting criteria for ARDS or needs O2 >6 liters per minute to maintain SpO2 >92% (or rapid escalation of oxygen requirement), 2) Respiratory rate>30 per minute, 3) Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg, tachycardia and other signs of shock, 4) Arterial blood gas with pH <7.3 or partial CO2 pressure >50 mmHg or above patient’s baseline, lactate >2 mmol/liter, 5) Concerning clinical appearance (cyanosis fast breathing, grunting, chest indrawing, inability to drink, lethargy, convulsions, mottled or cool skin). The decision of ICU admission was based on the criteria by Brigham and Women’s Hospital COVID-19 guidelines which were updated on December 20, 202031.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was defined as all cause in-hospital mortality in this study. The secondary outcome was defined as ICU admission.

Continuous variables were presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), or median interquartile range (25th to 75th) according to data distribution, and as absolute number (and percentage) for categorical variables; the distribution was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test. ROC curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value (by Youden index) for UAR. Differences between patient outcomes were studied with t-test for independent groups or with the Mann-Whitney U test if non-parametric analysis was required.The evaluation of differences between groups of categorical data was carried out with the chi-square statistics. In order to calculate the probability of mortality for patients admitted to the ICU, binary logistic regression analysis was used. Stepwise binary logistic regression was employed, where variables with p<0.05 were included in the multivariable model. The effect on mortality (survival) over time was investigated with the Kaplan-Meiere (Log-Rank-Mante Cox) and Cox Regression in the Statistical Analysis field. All confidence intervals were established at 95%; two-tailed significance level was established to be <0.05. Statistical data analysis was performed using the R v4.01(Vienna; Austria) with “rms” “hmisc” “epi” “survival” “ggfortify” packages.

Two hundred and four patients with COVID-19 (PCR positive) who were followed in hospital were included in the study. ROC curve analysis was made to determine optimal cut-off value for UAR. According to the ROC analysis, optimal cut-off with highest Youden index was found as 1.63 (Figure 1). Sensitivity of this cut-off value for in-hospital mortality was 86%, while specificity was 71%. Patients were divided into two groups as low UAR and high UAR regarding this cut-off value. Comparison of baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters and duration of hospitalization for these two groups were given in Table 1. The first group (UAR <1.63) included 119 patients, while the higher UAR group (≥1.63) included 85 patients. Although the mean age for the general population was 63±16.3 years, the mean age was 57.4±15.9 years in the low UAR group, and 70.9±13.2 in the high UAR group (p<0.001). Variables including the presence of HT, diabetes mellitus (DM),
chronic heart failure, coronary artery disease, and male gender were comparable between the low and high UAR groups (p=0.71, p=0.64, p=0.73, p=0.22, and p=0.08, respectively), whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic renal disease frequencies were found to be higher in the high UAR group (p=0.02 and p<0.001, respectively), while glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was lower in the high UAR group (80.60±21 vs. 58.5±24, p<0.001). Inflammatory laboratory markers including CRP, ferritin, D-dimer, white blood cell count (WBC), UA, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and LDH levels were found to be higher in the high UAR group (p<0.001, p=0.002, p=0.002, p=0.002, p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.003, and p<0.001, respectively). Albumin, GFR, lymphocyte count, and hemoglobin level demonstrated lower levels in the high UAR group (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.007, and p<0.001 respectively). Patients with high UAR required more ICU admission (14.5% vs. 51%, p<0.001) and demonstrated higher in-hospital mortality (0.05% vs. 43.5%, p<0.001). There was a significant difference in mortality between the two groups. We predicted that the difference in age and renal failure rate between the two groups significantly affected mortality.

Univariable logistic regression analysis to predict in-hospital mortality is present in Table 2. The parameters included in univariable logistic regression analysis were as follows: UA level, albumin level, UAR, age, creatinine level, CRP, AST, LDH, ferritin, hemoglobin, D-dimer levels, and leucocyte count. Among these variables, UA, albumin, CRP, AST, LDH, D-Dimer, ferritin, hemoglobin levels, UAR, age and leucocyte count were related to in-hospital mortality in univariable logistic regression analysis (p<0.001 for all).

In Table 2, multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict in-hospital mortality was given. The variables UAR, age, AST, LDH, CRP, ferritin, D-dimer, WBC, ferritin, and hemoglobin were included in the analysis. Among these variables, UAR, older age and WBC count independently predicted the in-hospital mortality (p=0.002, p=0.003, and p=0.03, respectively). The distribution of UAR levels for survivor (n=161) and non- survivor (n=43) was given in Box/Violin Plot (Figure 2). Wider distribution of UAR with a higher mean level was observed with this plot. The effect of UAR (reference: <1.63) on mortality over time (survival) was statistically significant (Kaplan-Meiere; 96.086±8.273 versus 17.065±1.623; Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox) p<0.0001; Figure 3). The mortality rate of patients with high UAR values over time was 3.164 times higher than the other patients [Cox Regression; Exp (b)= 3.164 (1.883-5.317); p<0.0001].

DISCUSSION

Since its emergence, COVID-19 has emerged with a pandemic that has arisen with a wide spectrum ranging from mild symptoms such as cough and fever to pneumonia, severe respiratory distress, need for care, and it still continues1-3. The course of COVID-19 in this wide range varies according to the basal characteristics of the patient (gender, age, HT, DM etc.). Moreover, COVID-19 affects the respiratory, urinary and gastrointestinal systems at different levels in patients, and it affects the blood values of the patients, especially the inflammation markers, at different levels. This shows the course of the disease and is a predictor for the course of the disease4-6.

One of these parameters is albumin, and some studies have shown that low albumin levels are associated with high mortality10-13. It has been shown in previous studies that albumin is decreased in malnutrition and as a negative acute phase reactant secondary to inflammation, and hypoalbuminemia has been shown to be associated with mortality even in the general population32, 33. Hypoalbuminemia may be due to the presence of a systemic inflammatory condition and malnutrition in COVID-19. It is known that due to increased capillary permeability due to inflammation, serum albumin may be extravasated into the interstitial space and the volume distribution of albumin increases34, 35.

In a study conducted by Shoji et al.36 in 2024, it was shown that the risk of serious disease was higher in diabetic patients infected with COVID-19 due to hypoalbuminemia, as assessed by the blood albumin level at the time of diagnosis.

Another parameter affected by COVID-19 is UA. In previous studies, hypouricemia has been shown as a poor prognostic factor in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis37, radiation pneumonitis38 and COVID-1919-23. It remains unclear whether the poor outcomes, particularly in COVID-19 patients, are due in part to a lack of antioxidants. Hyperuricemia has also been found to be associated with a variety of diseases, including coronary heart disease 39, HT40, kidney failure41, and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease42. This may be due to the direct pathophysiological effects of high UA concentrations, such as increased oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system, and insulin resistance43. In addition, there are studies showing that both hypouricemia and hyperuricemia increase mortality in COVID-19 patients3, 24. Although hypouricemia and hyperuricemia are thought to be related to the increase in mortality in COVID-19 patients due to the reasons mentioned above, these reasons are open to discussion.

UAR has been shown to predict mortality in various diseases, alongside indices such as NLR, PLR, C-reactive protein albumin ratio (CAR), and SII25-27. In studies, it has been shown that it is a better predictor of mortality than CAR in some patient groups such as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction30.

In a study conducted by Ertan et al.44 in 2024, it was shown that the UAR associated with 28-day mortality in patients with acute kidney injury developing in the ICU was important in showing mortality with 39.3% sensitivity and 84.1% specificity.

This study evaluated UAR as a predictor of mortality in COVID-19 patients. Patients were divided into the low and high UAR groups based on a ROC analysis, determining the cut-off value. Results showed that patients with high UAR were associated with more ICU admissions. UAR independently predicted in-hospital mortality. These findings suggest that UAR may be a valuable, accessible parameter for risk stratification in ICU and ward patients with COVID-19. Future studies with larger datasets are needed to validate these findings.

Study Limitations

Firstly, the retrospective nature of this single center study is one of its limitations. Secondly, this study had a relatively small number of patients. Thirdly, we only analyzed serum concentrations of UA and albumin on admission and did not have access to follow up measurements over time. Another limitation is that, unlike other biomarkers, there is no consensus on the standard cut-off values of UAR. Therefore, future studies including larger data sets are needed to test the results of our study.

CONCLUSION

UAR is a useful ratio that can be easily calculated with routine blood tests. In this study, we showed that UAR could independently predict hospital mortality in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, followed in the ICU and onwards.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from the University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Hamidiye Clinical Research Ethics Committee (decision no.: E-46418926-050.99-133138, date: 31.05.2022).
Informed Consent: The main focus of this single-center, retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: B.Ç.G., N.T., Z.S., Y.Ö.T., A.E.K., M.K., Concept: B.Ç.G., N.T., Z.S., Y.Ö.T., A.E.K., M.K., Design: B.Ç.G., İ.K., M.K., Data Collection or Processing: B.Ç.G., N.T., Z.S., Y.Ö.T., A.E.K., M.K., Analysis or Interpretation: İ.K., Literature Search: B.Ç.G., İ.K., B.G., N.K., Z.S., Writing: B.Ç.G., İ.K., B.G.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Izcovich A, Ragusa MA, Tortosa F, Lavena Marzio MA, Agnoletti C, Bengolea A, et al. Correction: prognostic factors for severity and mortality in patients infected with COVID-19: a systematic review. PLoS One 2020;15:0241955.
CrossRef
2
World Health Organization. (2020). Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV): situation report, 18. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200207-sitrep-18-ncov.pdf
3
Chen B, Lu C, Gu HQ, Li Y, Zhang G, Lio J, et al. Serum uric acid concentrations and risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:633767.
4
Li J, Huang DQ, Zou B, Yang H, Hui WZ, Rui F, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. J Med Virol. 2021;93:1449-58.
5
Yang AP, Liu JP, Tao WQ, Li HM. The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;84:106504.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
6
Nalbant A, Kaya T, Varim C, Yaylaci S, Tamer A, Cinemre H. Can the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have a role in the diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020;66:746-51.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
7
Gallo Marin B, Aghagoli G, Lavine K, Yang L, Siff EJ, Chiang SS, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: a literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31:1-10.
8
Fanali G, di Masi A, Trezza V, Marino M, Fasano M, Ascenzi P. Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside. Mol Aspects Med. 2012;33:209-90.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
9
Roche M, Rondeau P, Singh NR, Tarnus E, Bourdon E. The antioxidant properties of serum albumin. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1783-87.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
10
Wang Y, Shi L, Wang Y, Duan G, Yang H. Albumin and total bilirubin for severity and mortality in Coronavirus Disease 2019 patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34:23412.
11
Parohan M, Yaghoubi S, Seraji A. Liver injury is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Hepatol Res. 2020;50:924-35.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
12
Paliogiannis P, Mangoni AA, Cangemi M, Fois AG, Carru C, Zinellu A. Serum albumin concentrations are associated with disease severity and outcomes in coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med. 2021;21:343-54.
13
Acharya R, Poudel D, Bowers R, Patel A, Schultz E, Bourgeois M, et al. Low serum albumin predicts severe outcomes in COVID-19 infection: a single-center retrospective case-control study. J Clin Med Res. 2021;13:258-67.
14
Shi Y, Evans JE, Rock KL. Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature. 2003;425:516-21.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
15
Kool M, Soullié T, van Nimwegen M, Willart MA, Muskens F, Jung S, et al. Alum adjuvant boosts adaptive immunity by inducing uric acid and activating inflammatory dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2008;205:869-82.
16
Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008;27:608-19.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
17
Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:3136-41.
CrossRef
18
Abdelmalek MF, Diehl AM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as a complication of insulin resistance. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:1125-49.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
19
Gabarre P, Dumas G, Dupont T, Darmon M, Azoulay E, Zafrani L. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1339-48.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
20
Jin X, Lian JS, Hu JH, Gao J, Zheng L, Zhang YM, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of Coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut. 2020;69:1002-9.
CrossRef
21
Werion A, Belkhir L, Perrot M, Schmit G, Aydin S, Chen Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 causes a specific dysfunction of the kidney proximal tubule. Kidney Int. 2020;98:1296-07.
CrossRef
22
Dufour I, Werion A, Belkhir L, Wisniewska A, Perrot M, De Greef J, et al. Serum uric acid, disease severity and outcomes in COVID-19. Crit Care. 2021;25:212.
CrossRef
23
Li G, Wu X, Zhou CL, Wang YM, Song B, Cheng XB, et al. Uric acid as a prognostic factor and critical marker of COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2021;11:17791.
24
Bartziokas K, Papaioannou AI, Loukides S, Papadopoulos A, Haniotou A, Papiris S, et al. Serum uric acid as a predictor of mortality and future exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:43-3.
25
Paliogiannis P, Zinellu A, Scano V, Mulas G, De Riu G, Pascale RM, et al. Laboratory test alterations in patients with COVID-19 and non COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia: a preliminary report. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020;14:685-90.
26
Labenz C, Toenges G, Wörns MA, Sprinzl MF, Galle PR, Schattenberg JM. Liver injury in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;33:1194-00.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
27
Fois AG, Paliogiannis P, Scano V, Cau S, Babudieri S, Perra R, et al. The systemic inflammation index on admission predicts in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. Molecules. 2020;25:5725.
28
Tian Y, Li Y, Jiang Z, Chen J. Urea-to-albumin ratio and in-hospital mortality in severe pneumonia patients. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2021;2021:5105870.
29
Özgür Y, Akın S, Yılmaz NG, Gücün M, Keskin Ö. Uric acid albumin ratio as a predictive marker of short-term mortality in patients with acute kidney injury. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021;8:82-8.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
30
Çakmak EÖ, Bayam E, Çelik M, Kahyaoğlu M, Eren K, Imanov E, et al. Uric acid-to-albumin ratio: a novel marker for the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevated myocardial ınfarction. Pulse (Basel). 2021;8:99-107.
31
Brigham and women’s hospital COVID protocols. December 20, 2020. Available from: https://Covidprotocols.org/en/chapters/patient-assessment/#disease-severity-and-disposition-t4tualt31n26
32
Tseng CH. Correlation of uric acid and urinary albumin excretion rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwan. Kidney Int. 2005;68:796-01.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
33
Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium; Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:2073-81.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
34
Huang J, Cheng A, Kumar R, Fang Y, Chen G, Zhu Y, et al. Hypoalbuminemia predicts the outcome of COVID-19 independent of age and co-morbidity. J Med Virol. 2020;92:2152-58.
35
Soeters PB, Wolfe RR, Shenkin A. Hypoalbuminemia: Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019;43:181-93.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
36
Shoji Mayumi, Teramoto N, Ishikawa T, ett al. Hypoalbuminemia on admission in diabetic patients correlates with severity of illness in COVID-19: A retrospective clinical study and literature review. Endocrine and Metabolic Science (2024): 100196.
37
Abou-Mourad NN, Chamberlain BE, Ackerman NB. Poor prognosis of patients with intra-abdominal sepsis and hypouricemia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;148:358-60.
PubMed
38
Wang JY, Chen KY, Wang JT, Chen JH, Lin JW, Wang HC, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and severe radiation pneumonitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:735-41.
39
White J, Sofat R, Hemani G, Shah T, Engmann J, Dale C, et al. Plasma urate concentration and risk of coronary heart disease: a Mendelian randomisation analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:327-36.
40
Kuwabara M, Hisatome I, Niwa K, Hara S, Roncal-Jimenez CA, Bjornstad P, et al. Uric acid is a strong risk marker for developing hypertension from prehypertension: a 5-year Japanase cohort study. Hypertension. 2018;71:78-6.
41
Srivastava A, Kaze AD, McMullan CJ, Isakova T, Waikar SS. Uric acid and the risks of kidney failure and death in individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71:362-70.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
42
Kahnert K, Alter P, Welte T, Huber RM, Behr J, Biertz F, et al. Uric acid, lung function, physical capacity and exacerbation frequency in patients with COPD: a multi-dimensional approach. Respir Res. 2018;19:110.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
43
Joosten LAB, Crişan TO, Bjornstad P, Johnson RJ. Asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a silent activator of the innate immune system. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16:75-6.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
44
Ertan OES, Gökçe O, Bal C, Kocaturk E, Ertan O, Mutluay R. ınvestigation of the relationship between serum uric acid-to-albumin ratio and 28-day mortality in patients with and without acute kidney injury. J Acute Med. 2024;14:152-9.
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House